Teams

Grip n Rip

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY (Non-Adv) · Womens 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Womens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Nalinh Hanlon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.32
Suzanne Brown
published
3.25
Elaine Keller
published
3.22
Maureen Christen
published
3.17
Katy Roth
published
3.16
Monica Rogers
published
3.15
Eleanor Ruffner
published
3.13
Iga Hallberg
published
3.10
Lynne Mosier
published
3.07
Veronica Leal
published
3.04
Shama Mubayi
published
2.97
Lauren Brown
published
2.88
Eledith Falk
published
2.87
Brenda Feldman
published 3
2.84
Julie Ohlmeyer
published
2.53
Kim Fodor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Su Klein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shama Mubayi + Lauren Brown2346% games+4.4% vs expected
Brenda Feldman + Katy Roth2841% games−11.9% vs expected
Nalinh Hanlon + Suzanne Brown224 matchesnot enough data
Eleanor Ruffner + Kim Fodor134 matchesnot enough data
Eledith Falk + Su Klein123 matchesnot enough data
Iga Hallberg + Julie Ohlmeyer033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Ohlmeyer + Kim Fodor213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Ohlmeyer + Veronica Leal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nalinh Hanlon
34W–143L career · 7 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.37
Suzanne Brown
16W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Elaine Keller
3W–16L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Maureen Christen
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Katy Roth
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
Monica Rogers
16W–24L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Eleanor Ruffner
31W–65L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Iga Hallberg
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Lynne Mosier
17W–27L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Veronica Leal
15W–33L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Shama Mubayi
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lauren Brown
15W–27L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
Eledith Falk
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Brenda Feldman
10W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Julie Ohlmeyer
8W–20L career · no lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.84
Kim Fodor
16W–43L career · 8 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Su Klein
20W–24L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.