Teams

Glass/Rogers/PCC

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-27vs Gravette-Sparks/Bella Vista/KTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrendan Glass / Ben Fox vs David Taylor / Mark Popejoy2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBrock Hauser vs Bradley Heird6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarter Helms / Dan Twiss vs Jeff Gravette / Jesse Floyd4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-14vs Vargo/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNabil Kawas / Ben Fox vs Nithin Nanchari / Carlos Silva2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrock Hauser vs James Johnston6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesDan Twiss vs David Little4-6, 3-6
2025-04-28vs Vargo/Rogers/SVCCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBen Fox / Jonathan Feinberg vs Richard Allen / Nicolas Mejia6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrock Hauser vs David Little6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrendan Glass / Aaron Ebert vs Deric Neal / Ahmed Khan3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesDan Twiss vs James Johnston7-5, 6-2
2025-03-15vs Gravette-Sparks/Bella Vista/KTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndrew Fano / Thor Larsen vs Timothy Grailer / Michael Cochran1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesChris Taake vs David Taylor6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carter Helms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brock Hauser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jonathan Feinberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Dan Twiss
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Thor Larsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Andrew Fano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Chris Taake
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Nabil Kawas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Brendan Glass
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Aaron Ebert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ross Warnes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carter Helms
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brock Hauser
4W–1L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Feinberg
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Dan Twiss
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Thor Larsen
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Andrew Fano
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Chris Taake
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Nabil Kawas
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Brendan Glass
1W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Aaron Ebert
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ross Warnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.