Teams

KTC Brown

2023 OH OV FALL A18&O · Fall 3.0 Women Weekend Dayton

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-11vs KTC HudsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJanet Brown / Jennifer Augustine vs Emily Hudson / Sonja Smallwood6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAmy Rohmiller vs Zina Williams3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSydney Corbean / Lisa Sauer vs Noreen Beiersdorfer / Marilyn Donoff7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTonya Peters / Sandra Smith vs Kelly Carter / Shilpa Goel5-7, 5-7
2022-10-15vs WPAFB KurtzWon 21
L#1 SinglesTaylor Pack vs Kathryn Staiger6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Sauer / TOMOKO WELDE vs Molly McKenna / Annette Oakes6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAmy Rohmiller / Ailing Weng vs Debbie McKenzie / Sherley Kurtz6-2, 7-6
2022-07-16vs KTC HudsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanet Brown / Alesha Heilman vs Deidra Boykin / Jana Ramos2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTOMOKO WELDE / Terri Stark vs Penney Bentley / Christina Mortsolf2-6, 5-7
2022-06-18vs KTC HudsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlesha Heilman / Lisa Sauer vs Emily Hudson / Sherry Stapleton7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPenney Bentley / Sandra Smith vs Jana Ramos / Deidra Boykin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-28vs KTC HudsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Sauer / Kelly St. Clair vs Jana Ramos / Sonja Smallwood6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDaphne Warner / Starlene Brooks vs Sherry Stapleton / Terri Stark6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall 3.0 Women Weekend Dayton have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
TOMOKO WELDE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Taylor Pack
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.11
Sydney Corbean
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published
3.03
Lisa Sauer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
2.83
Penney Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ashley Nichols
published 3
Christina Mortsolf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Debbie Doyle
published 3
2.73
Tonya Peters
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.71
Amy Rohmiller
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Starlene Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.46
Alesha Heilman
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.43
Ailing Weng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Daphne Warner
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Jennifer Augustine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Lewis
published
Sandra Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Starlene Brooks + Daphne Warner2648% games+13.1% vs expected
Tonya Peters + Lisa Sauer1447% games+7.0% vs expected
Christina Mortsolf + Lisa Sauer5452% games+4.2% vs expected
Alesha Heilman + Lisa Sauer4151% games+2.5% vs expected
Penney Bentley + Alesha Heilman6651% games−2.8% vs expected
Daphne Warner + Tonya Peters4747% games−5.5% vs expected
Ailing Weng + Tonya Peters1435% games−11.4% vs expected
Penney Bentley + Lisa Sauer3649% games−13.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

TOMOKO WELDE
127W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
Taylor Pack
37W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.33
Sydney Corbean
77W–58L career · 10 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Lisa Sauer
160W–109L career · 20 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Penney Bentley
59W–81L career · 16 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Ashley Nichols
14W–31L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Christina Mortsolf
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Debbie Doyle
40W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tonya Peters
34W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Amy Rohmiller
41W–65L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
Starlene Brooks
53W–102L career · 6 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Alesha Heilman
35W–67L career · 12 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Ailing Weng
21W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
3
Daphne Warner
30W–69L career · 6 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.40
Jennifer Augustine
40W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Lewis
37W–45L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Smith
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.