Teams

Parks/Knoxville

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-06vs Wills/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrandon Parks / Todd Blowers vs Thomas Shirley / Mike Mansoor6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRD McClenagan / Nat Scott vs Hoai Robinette / Hunter Arritt6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-08vs Wills/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Unger / Nat Scott vs Hoai Robinette / Matt Whitehead7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Douglas / Walker Moncier vs Shawn Huffman / Rob Bray7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrandon Parks / Wilson Hammond vs Mike Mansoor / Thomas Shirley6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-07vs Ward/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesEvan Hoffman / Christian McCall vs Daniel Waite / Tyler Hopkins2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Douglas / Tyler Govert vs Scott Price / Christopher Craig7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTodd Blowers / Zachary Berning vs Scott Krummen / Ryan Curtiss6-2, 6-2
2026-01-17vs Sheikh/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesEvan Hoffman / Quinn Epperly vs Stephan Scappaticci / Andrew Spears6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRD McClenagan / Alex Rush vs Husam Benkhayal / Marty Hoschette6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Park / Todd Blowers vs Zakir Shaikh / Hamid Nasrollahi6-1, 6-4
2026-01-10vs Keck18+/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesQuinn Epperly / Nat Scott vs Kyle Franklin / Mike McCarty3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Douglas / Wilson Hammond vs Kevin Keck / Allan Schoenfeld2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Parks / Todd Blowers vs Richard Ross Ewers / Matthew Bates4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Keck18+/Knoxville51162599
2Parks/Knoxville5112613122
3Wills/Knoxville3381021151
4Ward/Knoxville1561227180
5Sheikh/Knoxville1531531199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Daniel Unger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Evan Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
RD McClenagan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Quinn Epperly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Christian McCall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Alex Rush
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Nat Scott
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Walker Moncier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Michael Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Brandon Parks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.19
Tyler Govert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Todd Blowers
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Zachary Berning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Unger
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Evan Hoffman
27W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.85
RD McClenagan
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Quinn Epperly
10W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Christian McCall
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Alex Rush
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Nat Scott
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Walker Moncier
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Michael Douglas
17W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Brandon Parks
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.24
Tyler Govert
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Todd Blowers
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Zachary Berning
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.