Teams

Bordlee/18/3.5/WN/BREC

2026 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Night · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night

12 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 upcoming
Sep 8 6:30 PM
Bocage Racquet Club
Sep 15 6:30 PM
Independence Park Tennis Center
Sep 22 8:00 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 29 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Kitzia Bordlee
Oct 6 6:30 PM
University Club Baton Rouge
Oct 13 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Oct 20 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Oct 27 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Nov 3 6:30 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Freeman/18/3.5/WN/SOAC000000
2Jenkins/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
3Bordlee/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
4deVeer/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
5Chenevert/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
6Mansur/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
7LeBlanc/18/3.5/WN/BREC000000
8Neames/18/3.5/WN/CCLA000000
9Rosenfeld/18/3.5/WN/UClub000000
10Arseneault/3.5/18WN/BREC000000
11G. Smith/18/3.5/WN/Bocage000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Michelle Neustrom
published
3.29
Shelly Ortiz
published
3.28
Sydney Braud
published
3.27
Suzy Smith
published
3.25
MaryClaire Hotard
published
3.16
Ginger Ku
published
3.11
Kitzia Bordlee
published
3.08
Kelley Thompson
published
3.08
Katie Frederick
published
3.05
Mia Scherp
published
2.98
Sharon Wilkins
published
2.66
Monica Heitman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sydney Braud + Shelly Ortiz5360% games+12.6% vs expected
Katie Frederick + Kitzia Bordlee4347% games+2.8% vs expected
Sydney Braud + Kitzia Bordlee5255% games+1.8% vs expected
Kitzia Bordlee + Kelley Thompson2349% games−4.1% vs expected
Sydney Braud + Kelley Thompson3447% games−5.1% vs expected
Sharon Wilkins + Kitzia Bordlee3442% games−10.0% vs expected
Katie Frederick + Monica Heitman123 matchesnot enough data
Kitzia Bordlee + Ginger Ku123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Neustrom
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Shelly Ortiz
17W–19L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Sydney Braud
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Suzy Smith
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
MaryClaire Hotard
26W–29L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Ginger Ku
33W–38L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Kitzia Bordlee
23W–26L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kelley Thompson
13W–18L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Katie Frederick
17W–24L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
Mia Scherp
12W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
Sharon Wilkins
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Monica Heitman
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.