Teams

ATaylor (Queens)

2025 Singles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-21vs KCantrell (Jeff Adams)Won 30
W#1 SinglesCaroline Frank vs Susan Sullivan6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSheila Walsh vs Christina Thigpen6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGabriela Cooper-Vespa vs Katie Crosby6-0, 6-1
2025-07-14vs ASolak (Jeff Adams)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJulia Wilson vs Alexis Solak6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMorgan Scruggs vs Julie Williams6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMadeline Weih vs Christine Kessel6-1, 6-0
2025-07-07vs KEarly (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCynthia Brinneman vs Morgan Hoecherl6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesGabriela Cooper-Vespa vs Palak Merchant6-1, 6-0
2025-06-25vs KCantrell (Jeff Adams)Won 21
L#1 SinglesMorgan Scruggs vs Megan Hunter0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJulia Wilson vs Colleen Hickman6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCynthia Brinneman vs Sophie Graham6-2, 6-0
2025-06-09vs ASolak (Jeff Adams)Won 30
W#1 SinglesSheila Walsh vs Alexis Solak6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGabriela Cooper-Vespa vs Julie Williams6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAustin Taylor vs Jennifer Krysinski6-0, 6-3
2025-06-02vs MGriffin (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesCynthia Brinneman vs Megan Griffin6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesGabriela Cooper-Vespa vs Lorna Doucette6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Caroline Frank
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Cynthia Brinneman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
4.12
Madeline Weih
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.04
Sheila Walsh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.90
Julia Wilson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.87
Austin Taylor
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.82
Morgan Scruggs
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.80
Gabriela Cooper-Vespa
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin Taylor + Morgan Scruggs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caroline Frank
52W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.50
4
Cynthia Brinneman
73W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.14
Madeline Weih
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.12
Sheila Walsh
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Julia Wilson
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Austin Taylor
55W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Morgan Scruggs
21W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Gabriela Cooper-Vespa
40W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.