Teams

Fry/Hannigan

2025 Adult 55 & Over · Women 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-22vs STLWC/Woodard/Feldman/55 Over8.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Fry / Dee Ann Lane vs Linda Woodard / Denise Inman6-7, 5-5
L#2 DoublesJudy Sindecuse / Robyn Tweedy vs Elizabeth Spencer / Lisa Moore2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSue Percy / Laura Kohnen vs Rose Luh / Norma Feldman7-6, 6-2
2025-05-15vs STL/Goldmann/Fridley/55&Over 8.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesDee Ann Lane / Patricia Fry vs Stacey Roath / Amy Siebenman6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRegan Hannigan / Claire Boone vs Deborah Washburn / Dale Schneider2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSue Percy / Susan Fisher vs Regina Becker / Leanne Cantu2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-08vs BlakeWon 21
W#1 DoublesSue Percy / Dee Ann Lane vs Molly Clipp / Madonna Benjamin4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Fisher / Claire Boone vs Ann Grassle / Michelle Kellogg7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobyn Tweedy / Laura Kohnen vs Carla Brown / Dana Mazzier5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Patricia Fry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Claire Boone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Dee Ann Lane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Sue Percy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Kelly Lauman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Laura Kohnen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Judy Sindecuse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Robyn Tweedy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Regan Hannigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Fry + Kelly Lauman5260% games+11.6% vs expected
Patricia Fry + Sue Percy8353% games+7.9% vs expected
Sue Percy + Regan Hannigan2649% games+3.9% vs expected
Patricia Fry + Regan Hannigan161550% games+0.3% vs expected
Dee Ann Lane + Sue Percy6257% games−0.6% vs expected
Patricia Fry + Dee Ann Lane161552% games−1.4% vs expected
Laura Kohnen + Regan Hannigan0643% games−3.6% vs expected
Patricia Fry + Susan Fisher314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Fry
182W–100L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Claire Boone
37W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Dee Ann Lane
55W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Sue Percy
137W–86L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Kelly Lauman
55W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Laura Kohnen
53W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
Judy Sindecuse
72W–72L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Robyn Tweedy
31W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Regan Hannigan
167W–176L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
Susan Fisher
59W–51L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.