Teams

BHSC-Weck

2024 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-23vs Keswick Hungry Hounds-MarkowitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennie Chiu / Thomas Weck vs Ellen Markowitz / Jay Reeves3-6, 2-6
2024-05-21vs ACAC-ParadaWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Walker / Thomas Weck vs Jordan Barr / Catherine DeSouza6-2, 6-2
2024-05-17vs Keswick Hungry Hounds-MarkowitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Carr / Mark Raffinan vs Peter Gunter / Nancy Holt6-2, 6-1
2024-05-03vs ACAC-ParadaWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Weck / Martha Carr vs Jordan Barr / Joyce Steed4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Keswick Hungry Hounds-MarkowitzWon 20
W#2 DoublesLinda Walker / Thomas Weck vs Candace Deloach / Samuel Hewitt7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMartha Carr / Mark Raffinan vs Lisa Jett / Peter Gunter6-2, 6-2
2024-04-12vs ACAC-ParadaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennie Chiu / Mark Raffinan vs Donald Polifka / Lindsay Bazydlo7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Walker / Thomas Weck vs Ramzi Talhouk / Tammy Hertel6-3, 6-3
2024-03-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMartha Carr / Mark Raffinan vs Tammy Hertel / Donald Polifka6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Walker / Thomas Weck vs Lisa Jett / Amit Shahane6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Reid Phillips
published
4.41
Linda Walker
published 4.5
4.40
Todd Sechser
published
4.21
Mark Raffinan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
4.04
Thomas Weck
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
4.01
Robert Cueva
published
Jennie Chiu
published
Martha Carr
published
Meredith Holmes
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Linda Walker
48W–35L career · type S · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
4.41
Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Mark Raffinan
72W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
4.21
Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Thomas Weck
69W–44L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
Robert Cueva
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Jennie Chiu
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Martha Carr
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Holmes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.