Teams

Jo.Brown18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-23vs Ra.Xu18ALost 02
L#1 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs Brett Compton0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn-Michael O'Neill / Rhett Hartley vs Noah Yao / Brady Sowers2-6, 3-6
2024-04-16Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChris Wandor vs Terrence Blue3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-04-09vs Ry.Berliner18ALost 12
W#2 DoublesDragan Jagnjic / John-Michael O'Neill vs Benjamin Katz / Randy Poteat1-1
L#2 SinglesMarcelo Roschel vs Youngjun Lee1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRhett Hartley / Chris Wandor vs Andrew Christenson / Spencer Johnson5-7, 3-6
2024-04-02vs Ad.Dailey18ALost 02
L#2 SinglesChris Wandor vs Scott Underwood3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEmanuele Michi / John-Michael O'Neill vs Sterling Thomas / Daniel Shields5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJohn-Michael O'Neill vs Tyler Smith4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-03-12vs Dy.DeMacy18ALost 02
L#2 DoublesRhett Hartley / John-Michael O'Neill vs Larry Leins / Frank Allison4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Austin / Marcelo Roschel vs Cody Sutler / Dylan DeMacy5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-03-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarcelo Roschel / Rhett Hartley vs Michael Shaw / Mark Uttridge3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kevin Wolborsky
published
3.73
Nick Martinelli
published
3.67
Marcelo Roschel
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.65
David Mailly
published 4
3.48
Rhett Hartley
published
3.41
Chris Wandor
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.37
John-Michael O'Neill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Pete Padilla
published
3.18
Emanuele Michi
published
Jeffrey Marcus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcelo Roschel + Chris Wandor134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Wolborsky
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Nick Martinelli
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Marcelo Roschel
115W–59L career · 10 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
David Mailly
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Rhett Hartley
11W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Chris Wandor
51W–39L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
John-Michael O'Neill
29W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Pete Padilla
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.19
Emanuele Michi
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jeffrey Marcus
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.