Teams

Olympic 1

2026 FALL A55&O · FALL Adult 55&Over Women 7.0 Thursday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-01-15vs New AlbanySplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Becky Savage vs Jayne Eichenseer / Theresa Donahue6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Mitchell / Linda McBride vs Jill Booth / Mary Kusovski6-3, 6-2
2026-01-08vs Racquet ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Becky Savage vs Annette Dimichaelangelo / Diane Crawford2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJane Heath / Allison Wilson vs Mary McGuff / Lori Russell3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKim Schmid / Elizabeth Miller vs Nancy Jones / Christina Graham5-7, 5-3, 0-1
2025-12-04vs The Players ClubSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Linda McBride vs Suzanne Shealy / Heather Evans2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Savage / Elizabeth Miller vs Janet Disbennett / Debbie Jerman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-20vs Olympic 2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Sampson / Linda McBride vs Krista Eckelman / Blythe Brown3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBecky Savage / Christine Mitchell vs Cynthia Pawlarczyk / Alisa Disalvo6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKim Schmid / Elizabeth Miller vs Sibyl Straughter / Anne Hunnell3-6, 0-6
2025-11-13vs Elysium 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJane Heath / Allison Wilson vs Mary Sampsel / Cathy Mautino1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Becky Savage vs Teressa Sciore / Debbie Lucas6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKim Schmid / Linda McBride vs Deborah Ellis / Mary Anne Acer6-7, 4-6
2025-11-06vs Elysium 2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Becky Savage vs April King / Dominique Benson5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Sampson / Christine Mitchell vs Alisa Sagar / Shelley Walter3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-30vs New AlbanyWon 21
W#1 DoublesBecky Savage / Barbara Wiese vs Brandi Burch / Janet Conrad6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Christine Mitchell vs Gena Merkel / Liz Romagnano4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLinda McBride / Pamela Smith vs Mary Kusovski / Kay Knoll7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-23vs Racquet ClubLost 12
W#1 DoublesJane Heath / Allison Wilson vs Diane Crawford / Annette Dimichaelangelo6-5, 5-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Becky Savage vs Karen Bradbury / Sarah Shaffer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda McBride / Pamela Smith vs Mary Homoelle / Lori Russell4-6, 5-7
2025-10-09vs The Players ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Christine Mitchell vs Jonalee Roahrig / Debbie Jerman6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-02vs Olympic 2Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Sampson / Linda McBride vs Mary Jo Kiourtsis / Donna Morley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Becky Savage vs Lucille Controguerra / Krista Eckelman6-3, 6-3
2025-09-25vs Elysium 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbara Wiese / Pamela Smith vs Ashley Borgemenke / Vicki Prescott4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Karen Sampson vs Martha Pfeifer / Marsha Friedli5-7, 5-6
2025-09-18vs Elysium 2Won 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Smith / Barbara Wiese vs Jeanie Chon / Shelley Walter4-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Miller / Becky Savage vs Monica Smith / Colleen Mathews6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Heath / Allison Wilson vs Jody Lynch / Toni Block6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for FALL Adult 55&Over Women 7.0 Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Jane Heath
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Barbara Wiese
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.23
Julie Smerdel
published
3.16
Becky Savage
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Christine Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Schmid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Sampson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Linda McBride
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Savage + Barbara Wiese7361% games+9.3% vs expected
Barbara Wiese + Jane Heath12754% games−3.4% vs expected
Kim Schmid + Julie Smerdel71149% games−5.5% vs expected
Christine Mitchell + Linda McBride2543% gamesnot enough data
Becky Savage + Jane Heath404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Heath
200W–156L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
3.5
Barbara Wiese
97W–104L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Julie Smerdel
53W–63L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Becky Savage
101W–91L career · 10 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Christine Mitchell
111W–125L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Kim Schmid
24W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Karen Sampson
36W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda McBride
23W–58L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.