Teams

SDNC 4.5 Kit Carson Park/ Buggs (3:2)

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-19vs SD LLW 4.5 Barnes TC/ HwangSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Broderick / Bernie Buggs vs John Carin / Wender Hwang6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDavid Jaehnig vs Tommy West1-6, 4-6
2022-06-12vs SDNC LLW 4.5 San Dieguito/ FrommeLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / T Solomon Liu vs Christopher Arns / Alex Barnett0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBernie Buggs / DJ Jaehnig vs Donald McLeod / Erick Russell Elchico4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-05vs SDNC 4.5 RPTC/ Ishihara (2:3)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Anandha Subramanian / Mark Ishihara6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChad Basinger / David Jaehnig vs Samuel Conway / Shimul Chowdhury6-3, 7-6
2022-05-29vs SD 4.5 Tierrasanta TC/ Lu (3:2)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Jerry Lu / George Byrd6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Jaehnig / DJ Jaehnig vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs James MacDonald / James Froman6-3, 6-1
2022-05-07vs SD Barnes TC/ Houldin (5@ 2:30PM)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Tomer Yehezkel vs Jacob Bautista Baugh / Kent Kerner2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Broderick / David Jaehnig vs Will Garber / Sean Lee5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Kevin Pegels / Kie Wilcox6-4, 6-2
2022-04-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesBernie Buggs / Jeffrey Ford vs Daniel Primbs / Kihong Kim6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBernie Buggs / David Jaehnig vs Marc Guzman / Mike Deigan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
ALEXANDRE COLAS
published 4.5
4.40
Bernie Buggs
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.24
Andrew MacFarlane
published 4.5
4.19
Chad Basinger
published 4.5
4.01
David Jaehnig
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
Jeffrey Ford
published
John Broderick
published
Joseph Barbarie
published
T Solomon Liu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
ALEXANDRE COLAS
15W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.42
4.5
Bernie Buggs
155W–51L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Andrew MacFarlane
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Chad Basinger
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
David Jaehnig
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
4.01
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Broderick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Barbarie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
T Solomon Liu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.