Teams

LATA18/Piper/CAMP

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 4.0 Adult Mixed Doubles

18 players · average NTRP 3.80 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-10vs LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Sinegar / Ellie Graham vs Dawson Thornton / Megan Freiburger3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom Bane / Becky Piper vs Elliot Turner / Morgan Gardner1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Danielle Peeler vs Ben Freiburger / Lisa Hamrick3-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGustavo Bencid / Ellie Graham vs Elliot Turner / Morgan Gardner3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPalmer Keenan / Celia Keenan vs Lane Small / Amy Redfield2-6, 2-6
2026-05-18vs LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKeith LaQuay / Ellie Graham vs Elliot Turner / Amy Redfield6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTrevor Olenchuk / Hollis Head vs Zack Robertson / Megan Freiburger4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAaron Hilton / Becky Piper vs Joshua Simons / Amber Bryant3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Chris Sinegar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.96
Palmer Keenan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Aaron Hilton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Tom Bane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Gustavo Bencid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Hollis Head
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Keith LaQuay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Ellie Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Danielle Peeler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.62
Angel Roddy
published 4
3.49
Trevor Olenchuk
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.43
Kyle Olenchuk
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.32
Celia Keenan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Alec Deboer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Becky Piper
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Wendel Franklin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Jessica Kritzas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Molly Price
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angel Roddy + Chris Sinegar213 matchesnot enough data
Celia Keenan + Palmer Keenan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Sinegar
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Palmer Keenan
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.96
4
Aaron Hilton
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Tom Bane
25W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Gustavo Bencid
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Hollis Head
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Keith LaQuay
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Ellie Graham
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Danielle Peeler
48W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
4
Angel Roddy
92W–65L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Trevor Olenchuk
28W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
Kyle Olenchuk
21W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
3.5
Celia Keenan
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Alec Deboer
11W–14L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Becky Piper
36W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
Wendel Franklin
27W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Jessica Kritzas
7W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Molly Price
27W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.