Teams

LAWAGES/River Run

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-01vs LMFaye/Westport 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRuthie Naylor / Holly Ridgway vs Maryellen Fay / Mindy Sperling6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Reaves / Anne Wages vs Michelle Schmerge / Bernadette Bender6-1, 6-1
2022-04-28vs LDFiore/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Reaves / Holly Ridgway vs DIANE FIORE / JESSICA WOLTER3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 DoublesTara Hauk / Holly Ridgway vs Donna Turner / Amy Vincelette6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Wages / Ruthie Naylor vs Tracy Crouch / Stephanie Vaughn6-2, 6-1
2022-03-31vs LAHURLEY/Bailey Road ParkWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuthie Naylor / Holly Ridgway vs Johanette DoCabo / Akilah Grimes6-0, 6-0
2022-03-24vs LDFiore/WestportWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Kendrick Anderson vs Carrie Davin / Laura Gallapis6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHolly Ridgway / Ruthie Naylor vs Denise Shreve / Tracy Crouch6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Kendrick Anderson
published
3.23
Amy Reaves
published 3.5
2.97
Anne Wages
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Tara Hauk
published
2.75
Shannon Malmstrom
published
2.65
Holly Ridgway
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.43
Ruthie Naylor
published
2.26
Meredith Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Ridgway + Anne Wages224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendrick Anderson
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Reaves
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Anne Wages
45W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tara Hauk
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Shannon Malmstrom
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Holly Ridgway
42W–59L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Ruthie Naylor
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Meredith Harris
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.