Teams

LOCH.Tobin

2025 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-17vs PW.CoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesShannon Tobin / Kendra McCormick vs Andrea Agee / Martha Priest6-2, 6-4
2025-03-27vs TOC.SchuchLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Pamela Alder vs Jessica Willetts / Traci Kornegay1-6, 0-6
2025-03-20vs MCP.LevineLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Capetanos / Erin Cockayne vs Elizabeth Rupert / Katie Warren2-6, 3-6
2025-03-13vs ANP.LaineWon 10
W#2 DoublesKendra McCormick / Sarah Butler vs Michelle Alarcon / Katherine Fehervari7-5, 6-3
2025-03-12vs ACP.MurphyLost 01
L#3 DoublesErin Cockayne / Kristi Radzieta vs Megan Richardson / Julie Wray4-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs CAS.DeAngelisWon 20
W#2 DoublesCheryl Morgenstein / Kendra McCormick vs Heather DeAngelis / Rossana Bolla6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErin Cockayne / Lisa Capetanos vs Kelly Schomber / Targol Mirmirani6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-27vs TING.BaldygaWon 10
W#3 DoublesShannon Tobin / Kendra McCormick vs Megan Wagner / Trish Dare6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Rachel Poore
published
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.94
Cindy Larson
published 3
2.81
Lisa Capetanos
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.76
Kristi Radzieta
published
2.75
2.75
Sarah Butler
published
2.69
Pamela Alder
published
2.69
Kendra McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Erin Cockayne
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Cockayne + Lisa Capetanos13755% games+7.6% vs expected
Kendra McCormick + Sarah Butler123 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Butler + Pamela Alder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Poore
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Cindy Larson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Lisa Capetanos
41W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Kristi Radzieta
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cheryl Morgenstein
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Sarah Butler
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Pamela Alder
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Kendra McCormick
54W–126L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.69
2.5
Erin Cockayne
50W–35L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.