Teams

Bergen Bad Aces

2025 55&Over Men · 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-02vs NJ: TapasLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Wei / SeeYin Ng vs Won Lee / Jae Seok Shim2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDanilo Correa / Edgar Cala vs Bong Kim / Sungeun Kim0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRamesh Pamani / Daniel Bettinardi vs Hyun Suk Kim / Kyeong Yun6-2, 6-2
2025-08-26vs WTF OGWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Aaron / SeeYin Ng vs Clint Tomlinson / John Kim6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Allievi / Ramesh Pamani vs Andrew Bonanni / Johann Lim6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDanilo Correa / Jonathan Glassman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-19vs NJ: TapasLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuis Gonzalez / Daniel Bettinardi vs Raymond Kim / Bong Kim6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEdgar Cala / Alex Wei vs TAE LAH / Sungeun Kim3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Glassman / Ramesh Pamani vs Bruce Joo / Scott Lee1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-15vs WTF OGWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanilo Correa / Jonathan Glassman vs Clint Tomlinson / Johann Lim6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdgar Cala / Alex Wei vs Michael Cirasola / David Weeks7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDaniel Bettinardi / Luis Gonzalez vs John Kim / Amit Sareen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-08vs NJ: TapasLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanilo Correa / Edgar Cala vs TAE LAH / Jae Seok Shim1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Bettinardi / Luis Gonzalez vs Bruce Joo / Kyeong Yun3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Allievi / Ramesh Pamani vs Bong Kim / Sungeun Kim2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJ: Tapas6014410108
2Bergen Bad Aces237818141
3WTF OG0531226159

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Luis Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ramesh Pamani
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Jonathan Glassman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Danilo Correa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Todd Allievi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Daniel Bettinardi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
SeeYin Ng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Alex Wei
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Edgar Cala
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Mark Aaron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danilo Correa + Jonathan Glassman4265% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Bettinardi + Ramesh Pamani5057% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Bettinardi + Luis Gonzalez134 matchesnot enough data
Ramesh Pamani + SeeYin Ng314 matchesnot enough data
Danilo Correa + Todd Allievi123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Bettinardi + Edgar Cala033 matchesnot enough data
Ramesh Pamani + Jonathan Glassman123 matchesnot enough data
Edgar Cala + SeeYin Ng213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Luis Gonzalez
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Ramesh Pamani
48W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Jonathan Glassman
48W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Danilo Correa
49W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Todd Allievi
27W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Daniel Bettinardi
26W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
SeeYin Ng
46W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alex Wei
22W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Edgar Cala
48W–136L career · 4 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Mark Aaron
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.