Teams

Hershey - Sal

2021 USTA 40 & Over League · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.43 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-19vs ODCC - BrodbeckWon 40
W#1 DoublesDeborah Weaver / Maine Keith vs Wendy Lynam / Mary Chodroff6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGeralyn Umstead-Singer vs Susan Brodbeck6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargie Danko / Linda Topp vs Jennifer Small / Lisa McCormack7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristina Lacey / Lisa Torchia vs Luanne Irvin / Melissa Lese6-3, 6-4
2021-08-17vs Bent Creek - SchreiberLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargie Danko / Linda Topp vs Stephanie Zuckerman / Linda Mieszkalski6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGeralyn Umstead-Singer vs Kelly Flatt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Salinger / Meg Rogers vs Debra Schreiber / Andrea Reese5-7, 3-6
2021-08-04vs Hershey CC - TyndaleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMargie Danko / Maine Keith vs Becky Levenick / Lori Winger2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs Amy Wauhop6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGeralyn Umstead-Singer / Barbara Hawk vs Mary Seiverling / Diane Glass1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrenda Peffley / Peggy Szeles vs Aylissa Tyndale / Elizabeth O'Donnell0-6, 5-7
2021-07-27vs Hanover - LeeSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaria Salinger / Deborah Weaver vs Beth Apetrior / Chelli McGlaughlin7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs DEBRA GILREATH7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Topp / Barbara Hawk vs Amy Pomraning / Diane Greenholt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaine Keith / Christina Lacey vs Eva Hess Phillips / Karen Bream6-0, 7-6
2021-06-29vs West Shore - OrangeWon 40
W#1 DoublesMargie Danko / Maine Keith vs Beth McCrea / Laura Malinoski4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGeralyn Umstead-Singer vs Sarah Trujillo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaria Salinger / Barbara Hawk vs Susan Fridirici / Lois Jernigan6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Torchia / Christina Lacey vs Susan Ruch / Kristie Teets3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-10vs CPD/Hempfield - StrangeLost 13
L#1 DoublesMargie Danko / Maria Salinger vs Sharon Davis / Tina Loose2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs Carol Dimm6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Topp / Geralyn Umstead-Singer vs Kristine Criswell / Lisa Frick0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrenda Peffley / Lisa Torchia vs Linda Strange / Trisha Pearson4-6, 2-6
2021-06-01vs Hempfield - Hangen 3.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Topp / Brenda Peffley vs JoAnne Hangen / Tiffany Marino1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesGeralyn Umstead-Singer vs Susanne Nimmrichter6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Salinger / Maine Keith vs Vy Banh / Pamela Oleksa6-4, 6-4
2021-05-17vs Hershey - Chocolate ChicksWon 40
W#1 DoublesDeborah Weaver / Maria Salinger vs Mridula Mishra / Elesia Heimbecker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeg Rogers vs Kristin Jeffries6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBarbara Hawk / Linda Topp vs Tara Wolfe / Angela Peirce6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrenda Peffley / Margie Danko vs Susan Kitlan / Jill Hauck6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Geralyn Umstead-Singer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Deborah Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Maine Keith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.17
Linda Topp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Margie Danko
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.04
Maria Salinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.77
Lisa Torchia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brenda Peffley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Meg Rogers
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Rogers + Maria Salinger6550% games+2.1% vs expected
Margie Danko + Maria Salinger2543% games+1.7% vs expected
Brenda Peffley + Linda Topp2450% games+0.9% vs expected
Margie Danko + Maine Keith111649% games−0.9% vs expected
Deborah Weaver + Maine Keith6262% games−2.9% vs expected
Lisa Torchia + Linda Topp4546% games−3.9% vs expected
Margie Danko + Geralyn Umstead-Singer101547% games−5.9% vs expected
Maine Keith + Maria Salinger3547% games−6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Geralyn Umstead-Singer
99W–76L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Deborah Weaver
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Maine Keith
58W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Linda Topp
40W–33L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Margie Danko
81W–92L career · 6 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Maria Salinger
67W–73L career · 6 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Lisa Torchia
57W–131L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Brenda Peffley
16W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Meg Rogers
116W–76L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.