Teams

Canyon Creek/Gooch W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesSue Hart / Marlo Gooch vs Jennifer Lazar / Jennifer Deaton7-6, 6-2
2026-05-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiriam Hodge vs OLIA BOSOVIK1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni W3.5SWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarlo Gooch / Sue Hart vs Tina Hou / Susan Forret6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Laurin Shambora
usually #1 Doubles 85%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
3.44
Sue Hart
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Marlo Gooch
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Bernadette Olson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Brianna Fluellen
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Dede Vehslage
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Jennifer Whitaker
published
3.25
Tonya Ball
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Christine Fimbres
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.23
Michele Gurley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Cathy Langland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Leah Collins
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.22
Stacia Durham
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.20
Misty Westveld
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Cheyenne Harward
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Miriam Hodge
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurin Shambora + Christine Fimbres5549% games−10.8% vs expected
Michele Gurley + Marlo Gooch6358% gamesnot enough data
Marlo Gooch + Sue Hart8162% gamesnot enough data
Dede Vehslage + Michele Gurley213 matchesnot enough data
Dede Vehslage + Leah Collins213 matchesnot enough data
Laurin Shambora + Bernadette Olson303 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Ball + Leah Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Tonya Ball + Misty Westveld303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurin Shambora
50W–25L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Sue Hart
38W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
Marlo Gooch
26W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Bernadette Olson
18W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Brianna Fluellen
20W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Dede Vehslage
20W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
Jennifer Whitaker
17W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Tonya Ball
8W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christine Fimbres
17W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Michele Gurley
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cathy Langland
13W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Leah Collins
17W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
Stacia Durham
16W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
Misty Westveld
10W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Cheyenne Harward
10W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Miriam Hodge
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.