Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W GML North Shore CC Keane

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Mcdonald / Robyn Wilgreen vs Karen Moran / Kate McKenzie6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristin Bremenkamp vs Suzanne Laurila6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesShirley Denu vs Shelley Burns1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJennifer Mcdonald / Robyn Wilgreen vs Susan Schultz / Michelle Thren6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristin Bremenkamp vs Lindsay Harman0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShirley Denu vs Carissa Casey3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBetsy Jost / Melissa Bashaw vs Aliza Shafer / Madelyn Mickiewicz6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesShirley Denu vs Leanne Roth3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Keane / Monica Carlin vs Olga Eydelman / Julie Lois7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobyn Wilgreen / Kelly Keane vs Rosemary Morby / Sheila Washburn5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesShirley Denu vs Brenda Heinecke6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Keane / Robyn Wilgreen vs MICHELLE MESSLING / Deanna Weddig6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesShirley Denu vs Alissa Braatz3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Mcdonald / Kara McMahon vs Meg Roman / Stephanie Hillmann4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMelissa Bashaw vs Mercedes Paz2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBetsy Jost / Monica Carlin vs Maricela Feker / Tara Fox5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Kristin Bremenkamp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Robyn Wilgreen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.76
Kelly Keane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Betsy Jost
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Jennifer Mcdonald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Shirley Denu
usually #2 Singles 91%, also #1 Singles 9% · published 3
Kara McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Bashaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Keane + Robyn Wilgreen113041% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Bremenkamp
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
3
Robyn Wilgreen
13W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Kelly Keane
14W–42L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Betsy Jost
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Mcdonald
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Shirley Denu
20W–69L career · 11 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Kara McMahon
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Bashaw
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.