Teams

CBHS-Loggins

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-12vs NEGTA/Ginger JakinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarol Cheesman / Diane Horsley vs Cathy Kupstas / Lisa Lepkofker6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Mayhew / Sally Rector vs La Rue Gastley / Lisa Komanski1-6, 2-6
2024-11-15vs NEGTA/Ginger JakinsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzy Mercker / Rene Hordines vs La Rue Gastley / Melissa Drake6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathy Mayhew / Jane Buturff vs Lisa Dempsey / Linda Adcock4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSally Rector / Wanda Loggins vs Lisa Komanski / Christine Slate0-6, 4-6
2024-11-11vs CCC-CauseyWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Cheesman / Diane Horsley vs Mary Casper / Terri Smiley6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRene Hordines / Suzy Mercker vs Jeanne Lewis / Dancy Wynne7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKathy Mayhew / Linda Werren vs Sherry Dubose / Claudia Kempen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-21vs CCC-CauseyLost 02
L#1 DoublesJane Buturff / Kathy Mayhew vs Ann Nixon / Janice Johnson2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDiane Chilton / Sally Rector vs Dancy Wynne / Mary Casper3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Suzy Mercker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Rene Hordines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Carol Cheesman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Diane Horsley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Leisa Bruce
published
3.02
Kathy Mayhew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Linda Werren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Wanda Loggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Barbara Pasko
published 3
2.87
Randi Nelson
published
2.85
Jane Buturff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Sally Rector
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Diane Chilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Linda Ward
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Pasko + Linda Ward10956% games+5.1% vs expected
Jane Buturff + Linda Werren6550% games+4.6% vs expected
Kathy Mayhew + Linda Werren121051% games−0.1% vs expected
Kathy Mayhew + Jane Buturff71148% games−0.4% vs expected
Suzy Mercker + Rene Hordines7549% games−4.4% vs expected
Diane Chilton + Wanda Loggins51635% games−4.8% vs expected
Linda Ward + Jane Buturff9651% games−7.5% vs expected
Barbara Pasko + Diane Chilton2446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzy Mercker
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Rene Hordines
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carol Cheesman
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diane Horsley
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leisa Bruce
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Kathy Mayhew
78W–73L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Linda Werren
58W–60L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Wanda Loggins
96W–112L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.97
3
Barbara Pasko
37W–36L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Randi Nelson
28W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Jane Buturff
63W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Sally Rector
0W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
3
Diane Chilton
26W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Linda Ward
60W–41L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.