Teams

LoVV

2021 Prince George's Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-06-05vs No LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnjali Garg / Janessa Lidge vs Mia Dozier / Pamela Owens2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSheila Jennings / Patricia Williams vs Natalie Anderson / Beverly Rouse5-7, 3-5
2021-05-22vs Serving YouWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Windsor / Janessa Lidge vs Yvette Smith / Casey Royster6-1, 6-1
2021-05-15vs Team ZimmermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesMargaret Roberts / Terri Windsor vs Deborah Gebhardt / Emily Schabacker5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Williams / Rosemary Harty vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-11vs No LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Jennings / Janessa Lidge vs Mia Dozier / Obire Owinje7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs Lady AcersLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobin Bennefield / Terri Windsor vs Emily Barry / Mitsue Colin1-6, 0-6
2021-05-01vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanessa Lidge / Anjali Garg vs Beverly Taylor / Araceli Gaytan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-04-24vs Team ZimmermanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanessa Lidge / Sheila Jennings vs Beverly Carpenter Nickens / Calle Cone6-0, 6-2
2021-04-18vs No LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Windsor / Danyelle Taylor vs Mia Dozier / Obire Owinje4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Lady AcersLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnjali Garg / Janessa Lidge vs Jacinda Johnson / Jacqueline Davis3-6, 3-6
2021-04-16vs Team ZimmermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheila Jennings / Roxie Landry vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Williams / Rosemary Harty vs Lourdes Sanchez / Calle Cone6-1, 6-0
2021-04-11vs Serving YouWon 10
W#1 DoublesTerri Windsor / Robin Bennefield vs Nikki Rawls / Catherine Wynne6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Anjali Garg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Danyelle Taylor
published 3
2.71
Terri Windsor
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
Rosemary Harty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Sheila Jennings
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Deirdre Hughes
published 3
Janessa Lidge
published
Roxie Landry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Jennings + Terri Windsor3254% gamesnot enough data
Janessa Lidge + Sheila Jennings033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anjali Garg
230W–135L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.37
3
Danyelle Taylor
11W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Terri Windsor
140W–125L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Rosemary Harty
68W–73L career · 2 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Sheila Jennings
75W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Deirdre Hughes
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Janessa Lidge
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Roxie Landry
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.