Teams

Randle - RUTHless Racquets 3.0

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-26vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesMilad Ebrahimi vs Randy Lee2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Volker vs Neeraj Gupta1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJason Levit vs Jesse Brooks1-6, 1-6
2025-09-03vs Scanio - You've Been ServedWon 30
W#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Neeraj Gupta6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Lutas vs Keiichi Nakatani6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMatthew Mueller vs Jesse Brooks6-3, 5-3
2025-08-20vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrew Lutas vs Randy Lee2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Keiichi Nakatani6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAlex Embry vs Salvatore Scanio7-5, 4-2
2025-08-16vs Scanio - You've Been ServedWon 20
W#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Salvatore Scanio6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRay Krickel vs Jesse Brooks2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-11vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 03
L#1 SinglesDaniel Volker vs Randy Lee3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShashank Bhatia vs Jesse Brooks2-6, 5-5
L#3 SinglesJason Levit vs Keiichi Nakatani1-6, 4-6
2025-07-23vs Scanio - You've Been ServedLost 01
L#1 SinglesJuan Luis Garcia vs Neeraj Gupta4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
2.93
Ray Krickel
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.89
Andrew Lutas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.84
Daniel Volker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
Milad Ebrahimi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Alex Embry
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Jason Levit
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Matthew Mueller
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Shashank Bhatia
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Ray Krickel
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Juan Luis Garcia
18W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Andrew Lutas
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Daniel Volker
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Milad Ebrahimi
10W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Alex Embry
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Jason Levit
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Mueller
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shashank Bhatia
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.