Teams

Selma - Skier

2026 Selma Adult 40 & Over · Women's 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-04-03vs Selma - HomeWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarlene Skier / Ashley Gallion vs Julie Brand / DEBBY THOMAS6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEllen Sharan / Ann Osten vs Leah Leal / DANITA ALLEN7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Adcock / Christine Cook vs Carol Telehany / Diane Locke6-2, 6-2
2026-04-02vs Selma - HomeWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Cook / Holly Adcock vs Carol Telehany / Diane Locke6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMonica Kohn / Vanessa Brown vs DANITA ALLEN / Leah Leal5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Reasner / Leslie Calloway vs Julie Brand / DEBBY THOMAS6-4, 6-4
2026-04-01vs Selma - HomeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Calloway / Lauren Reasner vs Julie Brand / DEBBY THOMAS6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAshley Gallion / Ellen Sharan vs Diane Locke / Lisa Zanglin6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMonica Kohn / Vanessa Brown vs DANITA ALLEN / Leah Leal4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Selma - Skier30102472
2Selma - Home0321020140

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Holly Adcock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Monica Kohn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Ashley Gallion
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Leslie Calloway
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Vanessa Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
Darlene Skier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Ann Osten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Lauren Reasner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Ellen Sharan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ellen Sharan + Darlene Skier4452% games+11.3% vs expected
Vanessa Brown + Leslie Calloway5254% games−0.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Adcock
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
Monica Kohn
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Ashley Gallion
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
Leslie Calloway
43W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Vanessa Brown
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Darlene Skier
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.65
4
Ann Osten
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Lauren Reasner
18W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.37
Ellen Sharan
14W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.