Teams

Who is We? 3.0

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-08vs MunshellLost 02
L#1 SinglesMahmood Solaiman vs Gregory Breton2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Joshua Swann4-6, 2-6
2024-08-26vs You've Been ServedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPeter Tice vs Jason Glaw6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Keiichi Nakatani6-4, 4-5
2024-08-15vs You've Been ServedLost 02
L#1 SinglesPeter Tice vs Salvatore Scanio2-6, 6-6
L#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Bill Keating3-6, 6-6
2024-08-12vs MunshellSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Tim McNamara6-4, 3-4
L#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Sohail Razzaq1-6, 1-6
2024-08-04vs You've Been ServedSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Scott Ward3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesPeter Tice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-25vs You've Been ServedWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Matthew Joseph6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs Raymond Lyons6-4, 6-3
2024-07-21vs MunshellLost 01
L#3 SinglesPeter Tice vs Joshua Swann4-6, 3-6
2024-07-15Won 20
W#1 SinglesRichard McKeon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesPeter Tice vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-09vs MunshellWon 20
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Alexander Sodt6-2, 7-6
W#3 SinglesRichard McKeon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Tom Erdely
published
3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Sandeep Das
published
2.63
Peter Tice
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.62
Richard McKeon
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.56
Mahmood Solaiman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.35
Malcolm Frazier
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mahmood Solaiman + Richard McKeon6357% gamesnot enough data
Peter Tice + Richard McKeon3355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Erdely
27W–57L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
Sandeep Das
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Peter Tice
45W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.63
3
Richard McKeon
235W–409L career · 8 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Mahmood Solaiman
80W–158L career · 1 line in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
Malcolm Frazier
2W–16L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.