Teams

Piney Run

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-26vs SlicersLost 01
L#2 SinglesLamond Hill vs Roland Harris2-6, 1-6
2023-08-12vs Team TedSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJarrett Ray vs Thomas Kennedy7-5, 3-3
L#2 SinglesLamond Hill vs Michael Dunning1-6, 2-6
2023-07-30vs Team TedWon 21
L#1 SinglesSpudd Campbell vs Thomas Kennedy1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJarrett Ray vs Daniel Muntifering6-2, 3-3
W#3 SinglesVerdell Wright vs Eric Schmelzer6-3, 3-2
2023-07-29vs SlicersLost 12
W#1 SinglesBen Winik vs Andrew Maddocks6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLamond Hill vs Nathanael DeJonge0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesVerdell Wright vs Ali Hamdani3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Matthew Holubecki
published
3.36
Ben Winik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gerald Anekwe
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Jarrett Ray
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Lamond Hill
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Max Markrich
published
Spudd Campbell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Verdell Wright
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Holubecki + Ben Winik6253% games−1.3% vs expected
Max Markrich + Matthew Holubecki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Holubecki
53W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Ben Winik
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Gerald Anekwe
28W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Jarrett Ray
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lamond Hill
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Max Markrich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Spudd Campbell
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Verdell Wright
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.