Teams

Matzen

2026 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 5.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-30vs KS/Wegner/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDennis Matzen / Lance Henne vs Karlo Skvorc / Vinicius Rodriguez2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMitchel Whitmer vs Mickel Alexander4-6, 5-7
2026-04-29vs KS/Wegner/18&Over5.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesDennis Matzen / Lance Henne vs Karlo Skvorc / Vinicius Rodriguez3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMitchel Whitmer vs Mickel Alexander3-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs KS/Wegner/18&Over5.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruno Suiama / Matt Becker vs Mitchel Whitmer / Lance Henne6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDennis Matzen vs Vinicius Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Reyes / Colin Gillam vs Mickel Alexander / Steven Wegner4-6, 5-7
2026-04-26vs KS/Wegner/18&Over5.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMitchel Whitmer / Lance Henne vs Matt Becker / Bruno Suiama2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDennis Matzen vs Vinicius Rodriguez2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesColin Gillam / Frank Reyes vs Steven Wegner / Mickel Alexander2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/Wegner/18&Over5.0M40120055
2Matzen0401224146

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruno Suiama
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
Colin Gillam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.12
Dennis Matzen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.02
Mitchel Whitmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.97
Frank Reyes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Lance Henne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance Henne + Dennis Matzen0535% gamesnot enough data
Mitchel Whitmer + Frank Reyes4154% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Matzen + Frank Reyes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bruno Suiama
24W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Colin Gillam
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Dennis Matzen
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.12
Mitchel Whitmer
41W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
Frank Reyes
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.97
Lance Henne
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.