Teams

Glen Kernan - Rawls

2026 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Spring · 6.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-30vs Palencia - LindroosLost 01
L#1 DoublesKate Sharp / Nancy Kaye vs Maria Dekar / Lanay Gearhart6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-16vs FYC - MorrealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Christi Bisson vs Mary Kathleen Muldoon / Lauren Griffith0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanijela Pope / Gina Stakem vs Tammy Morreale / Elizabeth Rice3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLois Robichaud / Cheryl Matthews vs Katie Culp / Sara Bertoch6-2, 4-6
2026-05-27vs Eagle Landing - BrinkLost 01
L#3 DoublesLois Robichaud / Cheryl Matthews vs Rachelle Stewart / Mary Moody3-6, 3-6
2026-05-26vs Rivertown - CaballeroWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristi Bisson / Amber Kenney vs Susan Astary / Natalia Mendoza4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDanijela Pope / Gina Stakem vs Melissa Rojas / Rebecca Hamilton6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLois Robichaud / Ning Gao vs Jillian Copeland / Linda Cline4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-19vs Southside - AtkinsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKari Barron / Nancy Kaye vs Michelle Kalil / Tiffany Davis6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKim Alexander / Danijela Pope vs Rita Lenahan / Mary Grace Garcia7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLois Robichaud / Kristin Worley vs Valerie Markham / Lori Osachy7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-22vs Planet Swim - HenleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Barron / Amber Kenney vs Shelly Turner / Sarah Merritt1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDanijela Pope / Michelle Rossier vs Miranda Donohoe / Amy Henley3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Kaye / Kim Alexander vs Karen Papaleo / Nelda Guerra-Smith5-7, 1-6
2026-04-21vs Sawgrass - RendzioWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmber Kenney / Christi Bisson vs Erica Chigounis / Susan Reeves6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanijela Pope / Nancy Kaye vs Victoria Wolf / Betsy Delcour2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKari Barron / Michelle Rossier vs Lindsay Long / Stacey Mayer2-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs Yards - NoonanLost 12
L#1 DoublesStacy Gregory / Michelle Rossier vs Susan Hibble / Narong Khan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristi Bisson / Amber Kenney vs Renee Callahan / Whitney Jones6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDanijela Pope / Kim Alexander vs Beth McCann / Ginger Weible6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Stacy Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Danijela Pope
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.31
Kate Sharp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Gina Stakem
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Christi Bisson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Kari Barron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Lois Robichaud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Michelle Rawls
published
3.16
Nancy Kaye
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
3.07
Cheryl Matthews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Maria Sarmiento
published
2.87
Kim Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Michelle Rossier
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Amber Kenney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Ning Gao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin Worley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Rossier + Amber Kenney4245% gamesnot enough data
Kari Barron + Christi Bisson404 matchesnot enough data
Christi Bisson + Amber Kenney224 matchesnot enough data
Lois Robichaud + Danijela Pope213 matchesnot enough data
Gina Stakem + Nancy Kaye303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Kaye + Cheryl Matthews303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Gregory
15W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Danijela Pope
23W–23L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Kate Sharp
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Gina Stakem
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
3.5
Christi Bisson
16W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Kari Barron
12W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
Lois Robichaud
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Michelle Rawls
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Nancy Kaye
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Cheryl Matthews
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Maria Sarmiento
6W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Kim Alexander
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Michelle Rossier
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Amber Kenney
24W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Ning Gao
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kristin Worley
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.