Teams

BHSC WarHogs-Cueva

2025 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-16vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 31
L#1 DoublesMark Illgner / Reid Phillips vs Sami Habib / Mark Critchfield6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHal Flowers vs Chris Stambaugh6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Sechser / Justin Mutter vs Chike Dellimore / Ramzi Talhouk7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Wermeling / Howell Fendley vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Amit Shahane6-3, 7-5
2025-06-09vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreLost 01
L#3 DoublesGeoffrey Keenan / Thomas Weck vs Ramzi Talhouk / Chike Dellimore3-6, 4-6
2025-06-02vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 41
L#1 DoublesBrian Rowe / Eric Parker vs Harris Haynie / Mark Critchfield3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlex Wermeling vs Jonathan Proffitt6-2, 4-0
W#2 DoublesWescott Blemker / Howell Fendley vs Ramzi Talhouk / Scott Bohmke6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTodd Sechser vs Aaron Streit6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrandon Schartz / Jay Bolus vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Chike Dellimore6-1, 6-2
2025-05-19vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Raffinan / Todd Sechser vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Harris Haynie6-3, 6-3
2025-05-12vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Weck / Brandon Schartz vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Amit Shahane6-4, 6-3
2025-04-28vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 20
W#2 DoublesGeoffrey Keenan / Mark Raffinan vs JOSEPH MATHERS / Amit Shahane6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Weck / Justin Mutter vs Scott Bohmke / Ruoyu Zhang6-1, 6-1
2025-04-14vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreWon 50
W#1 DoublesWescott Blemker / Brian Rowe vs Harris Haynie / Mark Critchfield6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn McNeil vs Sami Habib6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJay Bolus / Raymond Moreland vs Jonathan Proffitt / Aaron Streit6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesReid Phillips vs Ruoyu Zhang6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Cueva / Howell Fendley vs Amit Shahane / JOSEPH MATHERS6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-07vs ACAC Drop Shots-DellimoreLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Juge / Mark Raffinan vs Christopher Gorman / Mark Critchfield6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Brian Rowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.43
Reid Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.40
Todd Sechser
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.39
Mark Illgner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.36
Justin Mutter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Alex Wermeling
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Juge
published 4.5
Hal Flowers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Raymond Moreland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Brandon Schartz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Jay Bolus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Mark Raffinan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Wescott Blemker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Thomas Weck
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
4.02
Howell Fendley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.01
Robert Cueva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John McNeil
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Weck + Mark Raffinan6164% gamesnot enough data
Justin Mutter + Raymond Moreland303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
4.43
Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.40
Mark Illgner
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.39
Justin Mutter
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Alex Wermeling
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Andrew Juge
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Hal Flowers
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Moreland
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Brandon Schartz
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Jay Bolus
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Mark Raffinan
72W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Wescott Blemker
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Thomas Weck
69W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
4
Howell Fendley
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
Robert Cueva
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
4.01
John McNeil
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.