Teams

9-MKuehn-DFC

2024 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-25vs 2-BTareen-EnoLost 01
L#3 DoublesMeta Kuehn / Patty Noonan vs Judith Stewart / Cecilia Edgar4-6, 5-7
2024-09-18vs 3-DCorey-CHTCLost 01
L#3 DoublesAdriana Doi / Stephanie Thomas vs Bailey Cook / Sarah Ederle5-7, 4-6
2024-09-11vs 7-LBible-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Thomas / Adriana Doi vs Jonda Young / Kelly Conklin6-1, 6-4
2024-09-04vs 5-KNorris-ENOLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdriana Doi / Cynthia Larrick vs Kelsey Norris / Katie Elder1-6, 1-6
2024-08-28vs 1-BBaird-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeta Kuehn / Amy Johnston vs Brenda Pratt / Laurie Droke6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Thomas / Danette Pachtner vs Bonni Baird / Tracy Crowley6-7, 4-6
2024-08-14vs 8-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesCynthia Larrick / Adriana Doi vs Cynthia Cross / Linda Gilchrist7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDanette Pachtner / Betsy Fulcher vs Christy Lewis / Elizabeth Faber6-1, 6-0
2024-08-07vs 11-SGraff-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Alden / Meta Kuehn vs Cheryl Smyth / Kinsey Wennerstrom7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana McDonald / Danette Pachtner vs Kari Lovetinsky / Abigail Weaver6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Amy Johnston
published 3.5
3.25
Susan Alden
published
3.04
Jeanne Murray
published
2.92
Adriana Doi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Meta Kuehn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Danette Pachtner
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.75
Betsy Fulcher
published 3
2.69
Cynthia Larrick
published 3
2.46
Patty Noonan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meta Kuehn + Adriana Doi2931% games−12.6% vs expected
Jeanne Murray + Meta Kuehn033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Johnston
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Susan Alden
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jeanne Murray
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Adriana Doi
38W–89L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Meta Kuehn
64W–113L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Danette Pachtner
32W–35L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Betsy Fulcher
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Cynthia Larrick
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Patty Noonan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.