Teams

Vineyards - Joy

2024 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-08vs Worthington - KennedyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Melanie Howe vs Pat Brennan / Linda Zimmer6-3, 6-4
2024-03-01vs Fiddlers Creek - FarnhamLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Kerry Turner / Claudette Workman2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Robyn Manners vs Vicky Ramuta / Carole Sloan0-6, 0-6
2024-02-23vs COLLIER/Duffy/55&over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Caruso vs Jean Duffy / Suzanne Jeffries4-6, 2-6
2024-02-16vs Lighthouse Bay - SaidelWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Melanie Howe vs Kathleen Hromyak / Karen Pascale4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-09vs Bonita National - DiLeoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Melanie Howe vs Susan Lindberg / Vivian Wong1-6, 5-7
2024-02-02vs Naples YMCA - TitmusLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Martha Scott / Sharon Struthers4-6, 1-6
2024-01-27vs GreyHawk - MooneyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Teri Solomon vs Mary Conaway / Jill Seitz4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Tracy Cartwright / Michelle Ruffing4-6, 5-7
2024-01-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Debbie Ley / Lee Ann Russell6-2, 6-1
2024-01-12vs Olde Cypress - BoutetSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Caruso / Robyn Manners vs Alicia Desantis / Loretta Leffin1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Howe / Mary Ann Paradiso vs Kim Boutet / Lisa Parisi7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dianne Mathes
published 3
2.73
Mary Caruso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Ann Robert
published 3
Mary Ann Paradiso
published
Melanie Howe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Robyn Manners
published
Teri Solomon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Howe + Mary Caruso21041% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Howe + Teri Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dianne Mathes
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Mary Caruso
63W–87L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ann Robert
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Mary Ann Paradiso
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Howe
23W–105L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robyn Manners
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Teri Solomon
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.