Teams

Gunther/Williams

2024 Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-24Won 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Katherine Tindall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Gunther / Shelley Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Yannone / Lisa Walsh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-14vs Party at the NetWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Sara Wagner vs Martha Nolan / Lisa Thompson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesShelley Williams / Audrey Gunther vs Ellen McLaughlin / Diane Sweeney6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Forgione / Stephanie Murphy vs Belinda McLean / Jennifer Noronha3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-11vs MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoi Remoll / Sara Wagner vs Donna Worthington / Mary Wallace6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Yannone / Cintya Leveque vs Amy LaMoure / Cindy Mexcur6-1, 6-3
2024-07-06vs Double The Fun 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesShelley Williams / Audrey Gunther vs PAULA SMITH / Tynika Wilson0-6, 3-6
2024-06-29vs The Vicious VolliesWon 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Audrey Gunther vs Janette O Logan / Margaret Dorsey6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAdrienne Dilaimy vs Ruzica Ragontse6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Forgione / Robin Atkins vs Renee Campbell / Brita Robinson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-26vs Party at the NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesRobin Atkins / Audrey Gunther vs Mary Jane Evans / Paula McCarthy6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-22vs MartinWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Forgione / Sara Wagner vs Mary Wallace / Maria Birnkammer6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAdrienne Dilaimy vs Christy Dupras0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCintya Leveque / Joanne Connelly vs Mesanie Lee / Elizabeth Baker6-4, 6-4
2024-06-17vs Double The Fun 4.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesKatherine Tindall vs Chanpen Teeranon6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShelley Williams / Audrey Gunther vs Kathy Crowley / Nicole White7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Atkins / Cintya Leveque vs Laura Henmueller / Karen Francis7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Elizabeth Forgione
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Katherine Tindall
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Audrey Gunther
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.84
Joi Remoll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Karen Anderson
published
3.73
Tara Ritter
published
3.56
Joanne Connelly
published
3.54
Robin Atkins
published
3.52
Shana Ahmad
published
3.52
Sara Wagner
published
3.44
Lynne Powell
published
3.40
Cintya Leveque
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Lisa Walsh
published
3.37
Adrienne Dilaimy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Karen Yannone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Ellyn McLaughlin
published
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Forgione + Katherine Tindall16559% games+2.0% vs expected
Joi Remoll + Katherine Tindall10264% games−1.4% vs expected
Karen Yannone + Cintya Leveque2549% gamesnot enough data
Sara Wagner + Elizabeth Forgione134 matchesnot enough data
Shana Ahmad + Lisa Walsh303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Anderson + Katherine Tindall033 matchesnot enough data
Audrey Gunther + Elizabeth Forgione303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Forgione
97W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.07
4
Katherine Tindall
150W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Audrey Gunther
172W–114L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Joi Remoll
143W–83L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Karen Anderson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.77
Tara Ritter
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Robin Atkins
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.54
Shana Ahmad
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sara Wagner
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.52
Lynne Powell
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Cintya Leveque
299W–231L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lisa Walsh
24W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Adrienne Dilaimy
70W–45L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Karen Yannone
178W–151L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Ellyn McLaughlin
89W–61L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.