Teams

CV-Del Webb Rancho Mirage/Wright/Gagnon

2024 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.64 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-11vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/YoungLost 01
L#1 DoublesGrace Baraniak / Cynthia Reyes vs Cathy Long / Merrie Vieco2-6, 0-3
2024-04-27vs CV-Palm Desert Greens/McCann/KimWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Milroy / Cynthia Reyes vs Jamie Bell / Sue Lambert6-1, 6-2
2024-04-21vs CV-Palm Desert Greens/McCann/KimWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Milroy / Cynthia Reyes vs Jamie Bell / Kathy Brandt6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-20vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Whitney / Nancy Closson vs Kate Slott / Jody Stewart5-7, 3-1
2024-04-13vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Wright / Lesley Gagnon vs Susan D Morin / Lori Tanking3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Pamela Milroy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Jane Whitney
published
3.69
Brooke Russo
published 4
3.61
Cynthia Reyes
published 4
3.56
Grace Baraniak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.20
Barbara Holmsten
published 3.5
3.18
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Kelly Walecki
published
2.71
Ann Robinow
published 3
Erica Carpenter
published
Nancy Closson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Holmsten + Lesley Gagnon3745% games−1.6% vs expected
Nancy Closson + Pamela Milroy6557% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Wright + Lesley Gagnon224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Pamela Milroy
112W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Jane Whitney
7W–0L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Brooke Russo
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Cynthia Reyes
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Grace Baraniak
61W–55L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Barbara Holmsten
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Walecki
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Ann Robinow
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.