Teams

EB: Tucci/Mulvey

2021 RI TRI Level · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / RHODE ISLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-05vs RP: LintonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Leite / Nancy DiNardo vs Cynthia Belshe / Katherine Linton6-7, 0-6
2021-12-02vs RP: DePalmaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Mello / Jennifer Leite vs Cheryl Bagaglia / Hope Curry7-5, 7-6
2021-11-23vs RP: LintonLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy DiNardo / Jennifer Leite vs Katherine Linton / Cynthia Belshe5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-11-09vs WB: Padula/LawtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCia Tucci / Kathleen Mello vs Dana Padula / Leslie Beaulieu3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-11-07vs RP: LintonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Mello / Nancy DiNardo vs Rhonda Carvalhal / Cynthia Belshe2-6, 3-6
2021-10-28vs RP: DePalmaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Leite / Nancy DiNardo vs Jennifer Depalma / Jean Aldous6-4, 6-3
2021-10-24vs RP: DePalmaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCia Tucci / Jennifer Leite vs Jennifer Depalma / Hope Curry6-7, 4-6
2021-10-12vs WB: Padula/LawtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Leite / Nancy DiNardo vs Leslie Lawton / Leslie Beaulieu6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-10-05vs WB: Padula/LawtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCia Tucci / Kathleen Mello vs Saskia Schulte Vennema / Dana Padula6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RP: Overserved/Werchadlo0862982
2EB: Pippitt08351075
3RP: Team Swoosh!/Davis/Curran08351185
4HOF: Gardner08261282
5RP: Cooper08171594
6CC: Litmanovich/Domagala08171593
7WB: Meyer/Ceceri0990370
8WB: Sugar Bums/Diehl/Salvator09541090
9EB: Tucci/Mulvey09451199
10WB: Padula/Lawton09451391
11RP: DePalma09361395

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jennifer Leite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Kathleen Mello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Nancy DiNardo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Cia Tucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Leite + Kathleen Mello8354% games+3.1% vs expected
Nancy DiNardo + Jennifer Leite322651% games+0.3% vs expected
Cia Tucci + Jennifer Leite3646% games−5.6% vs expected
Cia Tucci + Kathleen Mello2351% gamesnot enough data
Nancy DiNardo + Kathleen Mello224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Leite
108W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Kathleen Mello
113W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Nancy DiNardo
62W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cia Tucci
100W–127L career · 3 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.