Teams

Sweet Shots

2024 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Teufelin Traylen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Karen Kraus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Jane King Ayers / Jean Schnadig6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Michelle Roach / Andrea Bailey1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Karen Kraus vs Shaun Anderson / MICHELLE LY6-2, 6-1
2024-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Larson / Teufelin Traylen vs Sarah Shin / Jenica Susi6-3, 6-2
2024-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Sarah Larson vs Grayson Dempsey / Rachel Young6-2, 6-3
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Karen Kraus vs Sheryl Wehner / Milenka Coltman7-5, 6-3
2024-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Heather Dale / Kerry Blake2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Larson / Karen Kraus vs Maria Siri / Alma Siri7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
14%86%0%
3.08
3
Karen Kraus
79W–102L career
0%97%2%
2.84

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.