Teams

NJ RED

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs HRCA-N REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Mountain / Jennifer Grube vs Helen Lazzell / Jane Jussila3-6, 2-6
2023-04-29vs PH GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Strobel / Leah Vladika vs Prairie Robinson / Katie Mohler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Halliday / Amanda Wintenburg vs Julie Picha / Alison Dosher6-3, 6-4
2023-04-15vs LEBTC GREENWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichelle Halliday vs Karen Ramon6-1, 6-2
2023-04-08vs KC-RH GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeah Vladika / Natalie Cervera vs Sara VanHook / Joelle Arne5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Halliday vs Sandy Courtney6-2, 6-1
2023-04-01vs LEBTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Mountain / Jennifer Grube vs Kim Belitz / Emily Dreyer6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Tracie Cordeiro
published
3.50
Michelle Halliday
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Lisa Mountain
published
3.47
Becky Bell
published 4
3.30
Leah Vladika
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
published
Amanda Wintenburg
published 3.5
Christy Carello
published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Grube
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Natalie Cervera
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Grube + Leah Vladika134 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Cervera + Christy Carello033 matchesnot enough data
Becky Bell + Michelle Halliday123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracie Cordeiro
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Michelle Halliday
68W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
Lisa Mountain
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Becky Bell
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Leah Vladika
85W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
35W–31L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Amanda Wintenburg
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Christy Carello
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Grube
49W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Natalie Cervera
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.