Teams

NORFOLK - Claxton

2024 Norfolk Tri-Level 18 & Over · Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-09vs Raulston - Team FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesTijen Ireland / Suzanne Anderson vs Yuli Reams / Cindy Aston4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-19vs Raulston - Team FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesCourtney Violette / Kathy Courage vs Yuli Reams / Cindy Aston7-5, 7-6
2024-08-16vs Raulston - Team FunSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTijen Ireland / Kathy Courage vs Sarah Phillips / Holli Sawyer6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Tessa Robinson vs Veronica Cummings / Shawen Bartol1-6, 4-6
2024-08-05vs Raulston - Team FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesTijen Ireland / Flurry Yanez vs Cindy Aston / Yuli Reams2-6, 4-6
2024-08-02vs Raulston - Team FunSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCourtney Violette / Kathy Courage vs Sarah Phillips / Holli Sawyer6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCourtney Kellam / Megan Farr vs Veronica Cummings / Joan Corkery5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-22vs Raulston - Team FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Anderson / Flurry Yanez vs Lisa Green / Holli Sawyer3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Norfolk Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Rebecca Jucksch
published
4.23
Katherine Claxton
published
4.18
Courtney Violette
published 4.5
4.08
Kimberly McClernon
published
3.98
Tessa Robinson
published
3.84
Tijen Ireland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Lori Cox
published
3.71
Flurry Yanez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Courtney Kellam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Kathy Courage
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Megan Farr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tessa Robinson + Tijen Ireland303 matchesnot enough data
Courtney Kellam + Lori Cox123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Jucksch
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Katherine Claxton
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Courtney Violette
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
Kimberly McClernon
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.08
Tessa Robinson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Tijen Ireland
83W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
Lori Cox
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Flurry Yanez
51W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Courtney Kellam
120W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Kathy Courage
27W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Megan Farr
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.