Teams

BC-MCC/JanetWisialowski

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesCraig Benner / Stephen Testa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-30vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/BrentBlackmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesCraig Benner / Steve Shepley vs Dave Kang / Brian Hall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-23vs BC-MiraCosta/MarkWarshawWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Stillman / Bradley Buchanan vs Manav Gupta / NIYANT MEHTA6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-03vs BC-AltaVista/BenNguyenLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen McGee / Bradley Buchanan vs Derek Berz / Jack Freed6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-10-02vs BC-PalosVerdesTC/JamesKwonLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Davis / Craig Benner vs JOE TALOSI / Chris Talosi4-6, 6-7
2021-09-11vs BC-LLW-WestEnd/BrentBlackmanLost 01
L#2 DoublesBradley Buchanan / William Reiter vs Todd Arnson / Edward Ng3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Derek Brauch
published 4
3.68
Craig Benner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
William Reiter
published
3.62
Steve Shepley
published
3.55
Jesse Givich
published
3.44
Michael Stillman
published
3.35
KEVIN QUIGLEY
published
3.31
Stephen McGee
published
Gerald Torres
published 3.5
3.22
Bradley Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Bruno Gasparetti
published 3.5
3.17
Patrick Ready
published
Janet Wisialowski
published
Mike Yogi
published
Stephen Testa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Benner + Steve Shepley1444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Derek Brauch
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Craig Benner
37W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
William Reiter
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.63
Steve Shepley
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jesse Givich
22W–16L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Michael Stillman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
KEVIN QUIGLEY
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
Stephen McGee
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Gerald Torres
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Bradley Buchanan
40W–50L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Bruno Gasparetti
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Patrick Ready
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Janet Wisialowski
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Yogi
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stephen Testa
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.