Teams

ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 40AM4.0A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Shane Grevin
published
3.90
Pablo Reed
published
3.90
Ian Hannah
published 4
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.65
Song Bai
published
3.64
Kenneth Hoppe
published
3.64
Chris Micco
published 4
3.62
Luis Nanez
published
3.59
Geoffrey Kegley
published 4
3.57
Tony Fuller
published
3.56
Toby Tyler
published
3.27
Peter Kennedy
published
3.24
Christopher Horne
published 3.5
3.12
Alan Pilgrim
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shane Grevin + Tony Fuller224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shane Grevin
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Pablo Reed
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ian Hannah
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Song Bai
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Kenneth Hoppe
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Chris Micco
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Luis Nanez
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Geoffrey Kegley
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Tony Fuller
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Toby Tyler
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Peter Kennedy
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Horne
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Alan Pilgrim
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.