Teams

Jetc/Rogerson

2026 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-29vs Dillon/ThomasLost 13
W#1 DoublesJane Davis / Amanda Tolbert vs Cali Wilder / Natasha Cozart6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEva Roshberg / alina roshberg vs Francesca Tomassini / Marina Briceno1-6, 0-3
L#3 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Megan Forzano vs Catharine Utvich / Dawn Tartack0-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesKaley Miller / Celeste Ellich vs Meghan Murphy / Leah Parodi3-6, 1-6
2026-06-11vs Wrc/JinLost 14
L#1 DoublesJane Davis / Amanda Tolbert vs Chizo Obanu / Christina Medvid4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Nancy Carpio4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Belack / Megan Forzano vs Alida Gutierrez / Kelly Leong Poi1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEva Roshberg / alina roshberg vs Tammy Broderick / Angelica QUINTERO6-3, 6-4
L#4 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Aga Szostak vs Yiwen Fan / Maria Patricia Sanchez3-6, 1-6
2026-06-08vs WestonHills/MacariLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmanda Tolbert / Jane Davis vs Lauren Singer / Olga Lopez-Quintana1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Annette Macari6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEva Roshberg / alina roshberg vs Alejandra Ferrero / Lorena Castillo3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Forzano / Karen Belack vs Linda Cheung / Jenny Miller1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesAnn Chamberlain / Aga Szostak vs Sylvia Wimmer Salem / Kim Haralson4-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs Midtown/AlvarezSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnn Chamberlain / Tracey T Williford vs Rosie Levy-Harf / Mariana Cordon5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanet Moreira vs Lara Than6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Jane Davis vs Tania Kiger / Giedre Carrillo1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCeleste Ellich / Karen Belack vs Sofia Escarra / Karla Diab-Herrera1-6, 4-6
2026-05-14vs Piccolo/GrinionLost 23
L#1 DoublesKaren Belack / Yulissa Parra vs Jacqueline Serra / ZENIA RIVERO2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Arlen Salvatierra6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Jane Davis vs Isabel Shaban / Paqui Chinga2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Forzano / Eva Roshberg vs Patricia Grinion / Vivien Balcker2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesAnn Chamberlain / Janet Moreira vs Norma Vela / Laura Courtley-Todd6-3, 7-5
2026-05-11vs Broward/ContrerasLost 05
L#1 DoublesAnn Chamberlain / Tracey T Williford vs Natalia Smyth / Georgina Friend1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Christine Picanza0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCeleste Ellich / Jane Davis vs Sara Contreras / Thamara Pichardo3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Karen Belack vs Samantha Reedy / Martha Barliza0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesEva Roshberg / Yulissa Parra vs Deborah Hinson / Gloria Marquez3-6, 3-6
2026-04-30vs Midtown/BolinLost 14
L#1 DoublesYulissa Parra / Kaley Miller vs Jessika Bolin / Shamena Khan0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Elenis Hayes Colak2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Chamberlain / Jane Davis vs Deborah Marshall / Maria Diaz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Tolbert / Megan Forzano vs Nataliia Miller / Dayse Jane Varda3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesDiane Rogerson / DEBRA MILLER vs Jennifer Brooks / Maria Encalada1-6, 0-6
2026-04-27vs Piccolo/RadaLost 04
L#1 DoublesYulissa Parra / Kaley Miller vs Jessica Novikow / Rosane Villordo4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Belack / Lisa Greene vs ELEONORA TADDEI / Gabriela Rada2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDEBRA MILLER / Ann Chamberlain vs Mayra Squarini / Yoise Morciego Alfonso3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesAmanda Tolbert / Diane Rogerson vs Yolanda Reyes-Retana / Victoria Quintero3-6, 4-6
2026-04-13vs Winner/Lhp/BonadimanLost 05
L#1 DoublesKaley Miller / Yulissa Parra vs Ashley Savona / Kara Justicz6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeborah Stoller vs Jessica Frank7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDEBRA MILLER / Karen Belack vs Krista Schaefer / Marceli Bonadiman0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Rogerson / Celeste Ellich vs Yazmin Thomas / Darcy Pfaadt4-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesAmanda Tolbert / Megan Forzano vs Karin Turnoff / Alta Rogers6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Midtown/Montserrat92401539408
2Broward/Cordoba92401544412
3Jetc/Rogerson92391645433
4Piccolo/Sanabria56272867527
5Ltc/Paskow56243170535
6HeronBay/Martinez46203070501
7DavidPark/Racks&Raquets/Capella47243171548
8MissionBay/Cancelliere38173880555
9MUMidtown/Lazar/Torres010104083553

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Ann Chamberlain
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Kaley Miller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Deborah Stoller
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tracey T Williford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Janet Moreira
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Eva Roshberg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Yulissa Parra
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Amanda Tolbert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
alina roshberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.53
Celeste Ellich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Diane Rogerson
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.33
Megan Forzano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published
Aga Szostak
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Karen Belack
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.24
DEBRA MILLER
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lisa Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaley Miller + Yulissa Parra033 matchesnot enough data
Eva Roshberg + alina roshberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ann Chamberlain
9W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kaley Miller
22W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Deborah Stoller
20W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Tracey T Williford
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Janet Moreira
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Eva Roshberg
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Yulissa Parra
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
3
Amanda Tolbert
1W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
alina roshberg
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Celeste Ellich
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Diane Rogerson
8W–77L career · 8 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Megan Forzano
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.33
2.5
Aga Szostak
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Belack
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.25
3
DEBRA MILLER
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.24
Lisa Greene
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.