Teams

Blosser/55/7.5/CWD/TCC

2025 NO Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day · 7.5 NO (55&O) Women Day

14 players · average NTRP 3.83 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08vs Taylor/55/7.5/CWD/MCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Carriere / Laura Ramirez vs Linda Hebbler / Pam Weiser6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Blosser / Elaine Waguespack vs Laurie Gaudet / Amy Taylor5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKerri Becker / Lisa Blount vs Kathy Harris / Diane Rabin7-5, 6-4
2025-10-01vs Fritchie/55/7.5/CWD/NOLTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Carriere / Laura Ramirez vs Paige Morrison / Yvonne Keegan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHelene Barnett / Lisa Blount vs Renee Labadie / Andree Hainkel6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Blosser / Helen Galloway-Newman vs Marylou Freiberg / Carlotta Fritchie6-2, 7-5
2025-09-24vs Lafont/55/7.5/CWD/GACCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth Blosser / Kerrie McNeal vs Rebel Daigle Salsbury / Christy Dupre4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Delaporte / Laura Ramirez vs Kristi Alfortish / Patricia France6-0, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Arnold / Elaine Waguespack vs Robin Lafont / Julie Purdy7-5, 6-1
2025-09-10vs Thibodaux/55/7.5/CWD/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Wagner / Carrie Berger vs Johanna Zuppardo / Jeannine Thibodaux6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJennifer Arnold / Helen Galloway-Newman vs Blayne Gothard / Linda Doyle6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Descant / Laura Ramirez vs Kathleen Olsen / Petie Delcambre6-4, 6-2
2025-09-03vs Taylor/55/7.5/CWD/MCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesPamela Delaporte / Elaine Waguespack vs Lisa Yarborough / Linda Hebbler6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelene Barnett / Lorri Murray vs Julie Valdes / Amy Neves2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Arnold / Helen Galloway-Newman vs Kathy Harris / Amy Maniscalco6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-27vs Fritchie/55/7.5/CWD/NOLTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPamela Delaporte / Laura Ramirez vs Helen Jenkins / Elizabeth Todd6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Wagner / Elaine Waguespack vs Amy Macdiarmid Browne / Andree Hainkel6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrea Descant / Lisa Blount vs Michele Prokop / Renee Labadie2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 NO (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Julie Carriere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Helene Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Beth Blosser
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Andrea Descant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michelle Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Pamela Delaporte
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Elaine Waguespack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Laura Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.47
Lisa Blount
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Carrie Berger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Lorri Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Helen Galloway-Newman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kerri Becker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kerrie McNeal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Blosser + Helene Barnett4354% games+11.8% vs expected
Carrie Berger + Lisa Blount5069% games+11.3% vs expected
Laura Ramirez + Elaine Waguespack10364% games+4.2% vs expected
Beth Blosser + Andrea Descant161054% games+2.9% vs expected
Lisa Blount + Lorri Murray8258% games+1.7% vs expected
Laura Ramirez + Julie Carriere3255% games+0.2% vs expected
Beth Blosser + Julie Carriere2446% games−9.2% vs expected
Helene Barnett + Andrea Descant224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Carriere
19W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Helene Barnett
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Beth Blosser
41W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Andrea Descant
27W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Michelle Wagner
32W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Pamela Delaporte
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Elaine Waguespack
20W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Laura Ramirez
29W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Lisa Blount
18W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Carrie Berger
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lorri Murray
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Helen Galloway-Newman
32W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Kerri Becker
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kerrie McNeal
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.