Teams

ACP.Chambers

2024 CTRL Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-22vs TOC.AroraLost 01
L#2 DoublesDyvonne Ellis / Sandhya Raghavan vs Fang Cai / Kelly Walton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-04-28vs TOC.SwainLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarianne Cockroft / Gloria Camarena vs Shylaja Karimanye / Sarah Rodriguez1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDyvonne Ellis vs Cara Casuccio3-6, 5-7
2024-04-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDyvonne Ellis vs Sarah London0-6, 1-2
2024-03-10vs TOC.SwainLost 01
L#2 DoublesEileen O Riordan / Marianne Cockroft vs Sarah Rodriguez / Francine Pearce1-6, 2-6
2024-02-18vs TOC.BurtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGloria Camarena / Marianne Cockroft vs Savannah Davidsson / Rachel Hardin0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDyvonne Ellis / Meredith Russo vs Sally Page / Anne Ward1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.49
2.48
Meredith Russo
published
2.42
Jennifer Edmunds
published
2.25
Dyvonne Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Courtney Ponder
published 2.5
Jaclyn Ponder
published 2.5
2.15
Marianne Cockroft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.05
Eileen O Riordan
published 2.5
2.04
Joy Phillips
published
1.86
Michele Chambers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre + Dyvonne Ellis224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paola Karina Ubilla Jofre
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%54%46%
2.49
Meredith Russo
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
0%56%44%
2.48
Jennifer Edmunds
14W–34L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Dyvonne Ellis
31W–88L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Courtney Ponder
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Jaclyn Ponder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Marianne Cockroft
32W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Eileen O Riordan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Joy Phillips
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Michele Chambers
1W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.