Teams

CGM-Rushall

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Matthew Condit
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
William Haynes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.77
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.66
Dave Vinik
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Kevin Muck
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.61
Susan Ford
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.60
Heidi Babi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Lori D'Antonio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Cindy Rushall
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.19
Jenny Pizot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-03-25Won 21
L#1 DoublesMatthew Condit / MELISSA PISHION BOTTA vs Juan Li / Seiji Okumura6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesQuang Pham / Susan Ford vs James Graber / Bo Yu6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori D'Antonio / Dave Vinik vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-26Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Condit / Susan Ford vs Shannon Bilstrom / Ry Koteen6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJenny Pizot / Kevin Muck vs Annie Duong / Benjamin Yang6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Rushall / Quang Pham vs Michelle Aman / Brian McDonagh6-3, 6-4
2023-02-19Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Condit / Susan Ford vs Jesus Javier Ruiz Rojas / Carrie Putsch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Cindy Rushall vs Michael Sather / Sue Gregoire6-2, 6-2
2023-02-12Lost 03
L#1 DoublesQuang Pham / Susan Ford vs Steve Fogg / Linda Anderson2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMatthew Condit / Jennifer Schmelling vs Tanya O'Neil / Eric Anderson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKevin Muck / Lori D'Antonio vs Mikal Rahman / Karen Sullivan7-5, 6-4
2023-02-11Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Ford / Quang Pham vs Leslie Ballard / Josh Schweitz6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Matthew Condit vs Amy Bucher / Craig Pearce6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLisa Provost / William Haynes vs Jennifer Simmons / Brian Board6-1, 7-6
2023-02-05Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Ford / Quang Pham vs Ian Fudalla / Yuko Hopman6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Cindy Rushall vs Justin Shull / Nicole Ralston6-1, 6-3
2023-01-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMatthew Condit / Jenny Pizot vs Jennifer Larsen / Wahyu Setyawan6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Rushall / Kevin Muck vs Heidi Affentranger / Frank Collie6-1, 6-3
2023-01-15Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHeidi Babi / William Haynes vs Colleen Sharkey / John Doane6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Muck / Jennifer Schmelling vs Todd Kuribayashi / Minou Chau6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDave Vinik / Lori D'Antonio vs Peter Aleman / Emi Tsumura2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Matthew Condit
26W–56L career
not enough data
4.5
William Haynes
44W–45L career
5%95%0%
4.12
4.5
MELISSA PISHION BOTTA
16W–58L career
71%29%0%
3.77
4
Dave Vinik
79W–84L career
6%94%0%
3.66
4
Kevin Muck
64W–90L career
9%91%0%
3.62
4
Susan Ford
38W–107L career · type S
11%89%0%
3.61
4
Heidi Babi
3W–25L career
15%84%0%
3.60
3.5
Lori D'Antonio
77W–85L career
0%81%18%
3.44
4
Cindy Rushall
100W–170L career
64%36%0%
3.40
3.5
Jenny Pizot
44W–56L career
4%95%0%
3.19
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.