Teams

HOCO Granstaff

2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer Thursday Night · 3.0 MIXED SUNDAY AFTERNOON

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-20vs RN-WAITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesAaron Montoya / Jenny Jackson vs Charlie Lanphier / Elizabeth Herndon6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristopher Ryan / Kiara Laurent vs Joel Ginaldi / Janine Ellis6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCharles Mize / Stephanie Carlson vs Chuck Davis / Ellen Duggan3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-29vs RN-WAITEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Ryan / Emma Warren vs Janine Ellis / Joel Ginaldi6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStephanie Carlson / Sheign Fields vs Yvonne Apodaca / Chuck Davis6-1, 6-2
2025-06-08vs RN-WAITEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSheign Fields / Kiara Laurent vs Chuck Davis / Ellen Duggan7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJenny Jackson / Eddie Skoda vs Stan Grabos / Courtney Williams6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEmma Warren / Josh Warren vs Debbie Davis / Dannie Smith6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 MIXED SUNDAY AFTERNOON have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Kiara Laurent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Aaron Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Christopher Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.12
Stephanie Carlson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Emma Warren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Stacylee Johnson
published
Charles Mize
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Eddie Skoda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenny Jackson
published
Josh Warren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sheign Fields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kiara Laurent + Christopher Ryan5070% gamesnot enough data
Emma Warren + Kiara Laurent213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kiara Laurent
50W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Aaron Montoya
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Christopher Ryan
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Stephanie Carlson
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Emma Warren
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Stacylee Johnson
45W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Charles Mize
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Eddie Skoda
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Warren
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheign Fields
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.