Teams

Stonehenge Bull

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-22vs Raintree EvansLost 01
L#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Corrine Cooper4-6, 0-6
2022-07-15vs TDC SpillareWon 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Jennifer McGee7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-07-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Denise Weisberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Linda Larue
published
3.03
Maureen Sisti
published
2.92
Terri Estes
published
2.76
Donna Bull
published 3
2.69
Ann Falk
published 3
2.46
Betty Snavely
published 3
2.44
Betsy Goodreau
published 3
Zoe Emerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Bull + Terri Estes1636% games−13.6% vs expected
Terri Estes + Ann Falk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Weisberg
175W–162L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Maureen Sisti
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Terri Estes
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Donna Bull
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ann Falk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Betty Snavely
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
3
Betsy Goodreau
0W–10L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Zoe Emerson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.