Teams

1. November

2024 Virginia Refund Holding Area · Refund Holding Area

27 players · average NTRP 3.80 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Refund Holding Area have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Emma Shine
published 4.5
4.29
Liviu Carare
published 4.5
4.17
Anthony Nguyen
published 4.5
3.89
Natilee Festa
published
3.86
Candice Rininger
published 4
3.85
Debbie Messmer
published 4
3.80
Shelley Smith
published 4.5
3.79
Carolyn Healy
published 4
3.67
Michella Newton
published
3.62
Rebecah Shepherd
published 4
Rohit Munjal
published 3.5
3.19
Kevin Carter
published
3.18
Jennifer Gatewood
published 3.5
3.17
Megan Sultan
published
3.13
Elizabeth Marcotte
published 3.5
3.11
Li Ives
published
3.06
Shea Lilly
published
3.05
Marineth Kight
published
3.04
Joni Albrecht
published
3.02
Annette Vignone
published 3.5
2.95
Amy Kemon
published 3
2.91
2.91
Kai Yu
published
2.53
Beth Sanford
published 3
Kursat Yavuz
published
Lauren King
published
Tara Jakubik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natilee Festa + Carolyn Healy17360% games+7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emma Shine
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
4.52
4.5
Liviu Carare
227W–119L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Anthony Nguyen
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
4.17
Natilee Festa
39W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Candice Rininger
106W–90L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Debbie Messmer
234W–156L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%12%
3.85
4.5
Shelley Smith
30W–72L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.80
4
Carolyn Healy
49W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
Michella Newton
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Rebecah Shepherd
125W–110L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Rohit Munjal
151W–47L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Carter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennifer Gatewood
67W–49L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Megan Sultan
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Elizabeth Marcotte
166W–176L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
Li Ives
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.11
Shea Lilly
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · no lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.05
Joni Albrecht
53W–83L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Annette Vignone
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Amy Kemon
89W–51L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Charles Christianson
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Kai Yu
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Beth Sanford
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kursat Yavuz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren King
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Jakubik
36W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.