Teams

Seay

2025 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-08vs FindleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Williams / Tiffini Williams vs Aubrey Findley / Jackie Reily2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJoy Lee / Edith Kruckmann vs Kelda Rusher / Leslie Eugenio6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJan McKean / Cindy Seay vs Brooke Keller / Katarina Jacquemard4-6, 4-6
2025-11-08vs SummersLost 03
L#1 DoublesKalisha Lee / Lisset Leija vs Tara Morgan / Christine Summers1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGail Trostel / Jane Poquiz vs Ann Thornton / Andrea Taylor5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJan McKean / Thao Tran vs Jaime Marinaro / Megan Bennett2-6, 0-6
2025-11-07vs CooperSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLucy Mendoza-Wells / Linda Gleason vs Tiffany Haertling / Laura Locke6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Esco / Lindsey Sanders vs Noelle Ratliff / Katherine Wayles6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Ana Castano-Mears
published 4.5
4.08
Lisset Leija
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Tiffini Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Edith Kruckmann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Linda Gleason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Gail Trostel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jan McKean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Lucy Mendoza-Wells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Jane Poquiz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Michelle Esco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Cindy Seay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kalisha Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ana Castano-Mears
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
Lisset Leija
13W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
Tiffini Williams
17W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Edith Kruckmann
41W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Linda Gleason
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Gail Trostel
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jan McKean
60W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Lucy Mendoza-Wells
30W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Jane Poquiz
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Michelle Esco
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cindy Seay
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kalisha Lee
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.