Teams

Powell/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 3.0 Women 18 & over

15 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-24vs Babcock/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKatherine Garrott / Malaney George vs Maryellen Tabor / Jill Bishop6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie McClure / Abbay Curtis vs Lauren Bloodworth / Tricia Bergeron6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBrooke Clement vs Kristen Corrigan1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Hays / Julie Dunavant vs Elizabeth Babcock / Claudia Ziegler0-6, 0-6
2025-04-16vs Steinhausler/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMalaney George / Katherine Garrott vs Tamara Steinhausler / Alexandra Steinhausler6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKatherine Stringfellow vs Mickey Obenour3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAbbay Curtis / Mary Wilkes Yonchak vs Xiaoqun Akers / Stacy Oswalt6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Clement / Bailey Salmon vs Hollie Marszalek / Christina Pike3-6, 0-6
2025-04-10vs Thompson/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesMandy Powell / Leah Williford vs Kelly Irvine / Melissa Sherrod7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatalie McClure vs Sophie Edwards1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBailey Salmon / Lee Yates vs Jennifer Sigan / Emily Sadlow2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrooke Clement vs Melanie Schrank0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Garrott / Anne Bledsoe vs Chancey Thompson / Jami Feinberg6-0, 6-3
2025-04-04vs Babcock/MemphisLost 14
W#1 DoublesKatherine Garrott / Rebecca Dicken vs Maryellen Tabor / Ashley Matthews6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLeah Williford vs Katrina Moore3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Powell / Julie Dunavant vs Susan Charping / Tricia Bergeron2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKatherine Stringfellow vs Kristen Corrigan2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Hays / Bailey Salmon vs Teri Hirt / Jamie Earnest5-7, 4-6
2025-03-25vs Thompson/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesKatherine Garrott / Katherine Stringfellow vs Jennifer Sigan / Kelly Irvine6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesNatalie McClure vs Sophie Edwards1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLeah Williford / Lee Yates vs Christine Ohrberg / Jami Feinberg4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMalaney George vs Elizabeth Langley1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Hays / Anne Bledsoe vs Rachel Montague / Martha Carter4-6, 3-6
2025-03-16vs Steinhausler/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesLeah Williford / Rebecca Dicken vs Stefenie Block / Bonnie Price6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatalie McClure vs Stacy Oswalt6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrooke Clement / Julie Dunavant vs Mickey Obenour / Tamara Steinhausler5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBailey Salmon vs Kristy Richardson3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Hays / Katherine Stringfellow vs Susan Kruchten / Erin Shackelford4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Katherine Garrott
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
3.19
Malaney George
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Caroline Palmer
published 3
3.01
Natalie McClure
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Abbay Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.72
Katherine Stringfellow
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Bailey Salmon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.48
Julie Dunavant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Bledsoe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Beth Hays
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brooke Clement
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.24
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Leah Williford
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Lee Yates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Dicken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Malaney George + Katherine Garrott5171% games+17.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Garrott
22W–3L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Malaney George
15W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3
Caroline Palmer
13W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Natalie McClure
29W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Abbay Curtis
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Stringfellow
6W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Bailey Salmon
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.53
Julie Dunavant
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Anne Bledsoe
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Beth Hays
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brooke Clement
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Wilkes Yonchak
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Leah Williford
6W–5L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lee Yates
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Dicken
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.