Teams

UPTA55A/Johnson/Spindletree

2025 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 Adult Women - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-09vs UPTA55A/Rushing/RiversideLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Savercool / Lisa Maly vs Teri Rushing / Mary Walsh2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Johnson / Patti Kortenber vs Lori Fremaint / Suzanne Morris4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSally Juhasz / Adelaide Carpenter vs Susan Lackey / Mary Anne Larkin6-4, 6-3
2025-03-05vs UPTA55A/Rushing/RiversideLost 03
L#1 DoublesAdelaide Carpenter / Kim McKinney vs Teri Rushing / Mary Walsh2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSally Juhasz / Karen Penoncello vs Nancy Kohl / Lori Fremaint4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Johnson / Lisa Maly vs Cristina Koehler / Mary Anne Larkin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Karen Penoncello
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Patti Kortenber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Lisa Maly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Judy Schneider
published
3.59
Pamela Turner
published
3.57
Adelaide Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.46
Kim McKinney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Christy Wistar
published 3.5
3.40
Gail Wingard
published
3.39
Michelle Savercool
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Sally Juhasz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adelaide Carpenter + Lisa Maly7073% games+13.9% vs expected
Patti Kortenber + Sally Juhasz4160% games+11.1% vs expected
Adelaide Carpenter + Sally Juhasz17558% games+6.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Penoncello
25W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Patti Kortenber
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Lisa Maly
42W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
Judy Schneider
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Pamela Turner
16W–12L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Adelaide Carpenter
28W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Kim McKinney
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Christy Wistar
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Gail Wingard
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
Michelle Savercool
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Sally Juhasz
34W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.