Teams

MD.Winzenz

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-08vs TOC.RiderLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Rachael Boland vs Jackie Lee / Tanya Sirivolu3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRachael Kiker / Carolyn Lee vs Smita Paranjape / Lindsay Castret6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-24vs TOC.CuccaroLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachael Boland / Alena Spielberg vs Donna Stieber / Hadley Misenheimer2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Rogers / Rachael Kiker vs Meghan Howard / Stacy Rank2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Reiser / Allie Ligay vs Connie Kim / Miho Ogura3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-15vs TOC.CuccaroLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Lee / Rachael Kiker vs Meghan Howard / Nora Lenahan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-08vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Jillian Sloand vs Laura McNiven / Nancy Pack0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Amy Rogers vs Angela Ray / Jennifer Lefebvre6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-19vs TOC.CuccaroLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Rachael Boland vs Donna Stieber / Anna Tomkins0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Lee / Kelly Trimyer vs Helen Cuccaro / Sarah Ganong3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Donna Reiser vs Paige Jennings / Connie Kim6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2024-06-17vs TOC.CuccaroLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlena Spielberg / Rachael Boland vs Donna Stieber / Hadley Misenheimer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAllie Ligay / Beth McKinley vs Helen Cuccaro / Stacy Rank3-6, 4-6
2024-06-10vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJillian Sloand / Charlotte Burnett vs Nancy Pack / Laura McNiven4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Rogers / Rachael Kiker vs Smita Paranjape / Meghan Rider6-4, 6-3
2024-05-20vs TOC.RiderSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRachael Kiker / Jillian Sloand vs Jackie Lee / Tanya Sirivolu0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Rogers / Allie Ligay vs Angela Ray / Karen Reynders6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Cindy Winzenz
published 4.5
4.00
Rachael Kiker
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.97
Alena Spielberg
published 4.5
3.96
Charlotte Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.61
Allie Ligay
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.49
Rachael Boland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Donna Reiser
published
3.43
Kelly Trimyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Moses
published
3.09
Beth McKinley
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Winzenz + Charlotte Burnett1441% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Lee + Rachael Kiker303 matchesnot enough data
Rachael Kiker + Rachael Boland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Winzenz
87W–67L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Rachael Kiker
162W–90L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4.5
Alena Spielberg
0W–8L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.97
4.5
Charlotte Burnett
13W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
4
Carolyn Lee
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Allie Ligay
202W–66L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
4
Rachael Boland
19W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.49
Donna Reiser
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Kelly Trimyer
98W–53L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jennifer Moses
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Beth McKinley
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.