Teams

Westside - Overserved

*2024 Houston Fall League (2023)NA Friday Ladies Day League · 3.5 Ladies Doubles

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Emily Warnecke
published
3.46
3.37
Busadee Schulze
published 3.5
3.34
Tacy Singleterry
published
3.30
Karen Hellman-Diego
published
3.26
Marnie Vandenburg
published
3.25
Alicia Halphen
published 3.5
3.25
Connie Wong
published 3.5
3.13
Monica Parzinger
published
3.06
Peggy Schwabenland
published
Laura Dennett
published
Lisa Hughes
published
Melody Phillips
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Parzinger + Alicia Halphen6065% games+28.3% vs expected
Connie Wong + Tacy Singleterry7258% games−4.4% vs expected
Lisa Hughes + Monica Parzinger224 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Halphen + Marnie Vandenburg224 matchesnot enough data
Marnie Vandenburg + Tacy Singleterry134 matchesnot enough data
Connie Wong + Alicia Halphen033 matchesnot enough data
Connie Wong + Karen Hellman-Diego213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Warnecke
57W–31L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.54
Iliana Tommasi-Torrado
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Busadee Schulze
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Tacy Singleterry
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Karen Hellman-Diego
22W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Marnie Vandenburg
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Alicia Halphen
27W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Connie Wong
37W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Monica Parzinger
45W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.13
Peggy Schwabenland
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.06
Laura Dennett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Hughes
15W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melody Phillips
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.