Teams

Camargo

2025 OH OV SUMMER Career A40&O Cincinnati · 2025 Summer Career A40&O 4.0W Cincinnati

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-08vs Queen City GoldWon 40
W#1 DoublesShellie Leder / Cacki Jones vs Connie Allen / Stacy Hanna7-6, 2-6, 4-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Vick vs Julie Trusock5-7, 6-4, 2-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Davis / Elizabeth End vs Julie Krummen / Karen Worley7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Larkin / Kerry Foley vs Kathleen Adams / Nancy Wandtke5-7, 6-5, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Five Seasons KYWon 40
W#1 DoublesRachel Cass / Stacy Wilson vs Jennifer Antaki / Christine Frey7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDara Hudson vs Michelle Bultman6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesShellie Leder / Elizabeth End vs Mindy Hodge / Eugenie Kreutzjans3-6, 6-3, 4-2
W#3 DoublesMargeaux Parkhouse / Aliya Riddle vs Jennifer Haas / Theresa Schenthal6-2, 4-6, 5-0
2025-05-20vs Queen City GoldSplit 22
L#1 DoublesStacy Wilson / Shellie Leder vs Lizzy Peckskamp-Wayne / Tricia Headley5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Herrel vs Connie Allen2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDara Hudson / Stephanie Kennebeck vs Julie Trusock / Stacy Hanna7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth End / Amanda Larkin vs Jana Monzel / Kathleen Adams6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Summer Career A40&O 4.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michelle Gast
published
3.78
MacKenzie Curt
published
3.68
Dara Hudson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Shellie Leder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Cacki Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Stephanie Kennebeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Amanda Larkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Rachel Herrel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.50
Kerry Foley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Aliya Riddle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth End
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Vick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Margeaux Parkhouse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Davis
published
Rachel Cass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Tracy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shellie Leder + Amanda Larkin2645% games+0.8% vs expected
Shellie Leder + Cacki Jones8947% games−2.0% vs expected
Dara Hudson + Stephanie Kennebeck5647% games−10.7% vs expected
Dara Hudson + Shellie Leder123 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Larkin + Kerry Foley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Gast
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
MacKenzie Curt
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dara Hudson
28W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Shellie Leder
20W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
4
Cacki Jones
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Stephanie Kennebeck
5W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Amanda Larkin
11W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Rachel Herrel
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
Kerry Foley
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Aliya Riddle
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth End
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Vick
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Margeaux Parkhouse
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Davis
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Cass
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Tracy
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.